Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Use and Cancer Incidence in a Large Cohort Setting

  • RESPOND study group
  • University College London Hospitals, London, UK
  • Danish PCD Centre, Pediatric Pulmonary Service, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark , Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Unit of Medical and Molecular Genetics, University Hospital Sant Joan de Deu Barcelona, 08950, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense, Denmark.
  • Austrian HIV Cohort Study (AHIVCOS)
  • Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • University Hospital of Zurich
  • Modena HIV Cohort
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena
  • Italian Cohort Naive Antiretrovirals (ICONA), ASSTSanti Paolo e Carlo, Milano, Italy,
  • Saint-Pierre University Hospital
  • Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, CHU La Réunion, Saint Pierre, France
  • San Raffaele Scientific Institute
  • Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children’s Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
  • Université Côte d'Azur et Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
  • PISCIS Cohort Study
  • Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital
  • The Australian HIV Observational Database (AHOD)
  • ViiV Healthcare
  • Gilead Science
  • European AIDS Treatment Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist examining the association between incident cancer and cumulative integrase inhibitor (INSTI) exposure. Methods: Participants were followed from baseline (latest of local cohort enrollment or January 1, 2012) until the earliest of first cancer, final follow-up, or December 31, 2019. Negative binomial regression was used to assess associations between cancer incidence and time-updated cumulative INSTI exposure, lagged by 6 months. Results: Of 29 340 individuals, 74% were male, 24% were antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naive, and median baseline age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 36-51). Overall, 13 950 (48%) individuals started an INSTI during follow-up. During 160 657 person-years of follow-up ([PYFU] median 6.2; IQR, 3.9-7.5), there were 1078 cancers (incidence rate [IR] 6.7/1000 PYFU; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-7.1). The commonest cancers were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=113), lung cancer (112), Kaposi's sarcoma (106), and anal cancer (103). After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no association between cancer risk and INSTI exposure (≤6 months vs no exposure IR ratio: 1.15 [95% CI, 0.89-1.49], >6-12 months; 0.97 [95% CI, 0.71-1.32], >12-24 months; 0.84 [95% CI, 0.64-1.11], >24-36 months; 1.10 [95% CI, 0.82-1.47], >36 months; 0.90 [95% CI, 0.65-1.26] [P=.60]). In ART-naive participants, cancer incidence decreased with increasing INSTI exposure, mainly driven by a decreasing incidence of acquired immune deficiency syndrome cancers; however, there was no association between INSTI exposure and cancer for those ART-experienced (interaction P<.0001). Conclusions: Cancer incidence in each INSTI exposure group was similar, despite relatively wide CIs, providing reassuring early findings that increasing INSTI exposure is unlikely to be associated with an increased cancer risk, although longer follow-up is needed to confirm this finding.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberofac029
Pages (from-to)ofac029
JournalOpen forum infectious diseases
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • HIV
  • antiretroviral treatment
  • cancer
  • cohort
  • integrase inhibitors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Use and Cancer Incidence in a Large Cohort Setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this