Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Individualizing follow-up strategies in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma with flexible parametric competing risk regression models

  • Maria Anna Smolle
  • , Michiel van de Sande
  • , Dario Callegaro
  • , Jay Wunder
  • , Andrew Hayes
  • , Lukas Leitner
  • , Marko Bergovec
  • , Per-Ulf Tunn
  • , Veroniek van Praag
  • , Marta Fiocco
  • , Joannis Panotopoulos
  • , Madeleine Willegger
  • , Reinhard Windhager
  • , Sander P. D. Dijkstra
  • , Winan J. van Houdt
  • , Jakob M. Riedl
  • , Michael Stotz
  • , Armin Gerger
  • , Martin Pichler
  • , Herbert Stöger
  • Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger, Josef Smolle, Dimosthenis Andreou, Andreas Leithner, Alessandro Gronchi, Rick L. Haas*, Joanna Szkandera
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Medical University of Graz
  • Leiden University
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Fresenius AG
  • Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Currently, patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) who have undergone curative resection are followed up by a heuristic approach, not covering individual patient risks. The aim of this study was to develop two flexible parametric competing risk regression models (FPCRRMs) for local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM), aiming at providing guidance on how to individually follow-up patients. Three thousand sixteen patients (1931 test, 1085 validation cohort) with high-grade eSTS were included in this retrospective, multicenter study. Histology (9 categories), grading (time-varying covariate), gender, age, tumor size, margins, (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy (RTX), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) were used in the FPCRRMs and performance tested with Harrell-C-index. Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range: 23.3–95 months). Two hundred forty-two (12.5%) and 603 (31.2%) of test cohort patients developed LR and DM. Factors significantly associated with LR were gender, size, histology, neo-and adjuvant RTX, and margins. Parameters associated with DM were margins, grading, gender, size, histology, and neoadjuvant RTX. C-statistics was computed for internal (C-index for LR: 0.705, for DM: 0.723) and external cohort (C-index for LR: 0.683, for DM: 0.772). Depending on clinical, pathological, and patient-related parameters, LR-and DM-risks vary. With the present model, implemented in the updated Personalised Sarcoma Care (PERSARC)-app, more individualized prediction of LR/DM-risks is made possible.
Original languageEnglish
Article number47
JournalCancers
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individualizing follow-up strategies in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma with flexible parametric competing risk regression models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this