Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: data from two prospective cohort studies

  • Ruben J. Eck*
  • , Lisa Hulshof
  • , Renske Wiersema
  • , Chris H. L. Thio
  • , Bart Hiemstra
  • , Niels C. Gritters van den Oever
  • , Reinold O. B. Gans
  • , Iwan C. C. van der Horst
  • , Karina Meijer
  • , Frederik Keus
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Groningen
  • Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Treant Zorggroep Emmen, Emmen, The Netherlands
  • Maastricht University
  • Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients receiving contemporary thrombosis prophylaxis. Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of two prospective cohort studies. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital pulmonary embolism or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (PE-LDVT), in-hospital nonleg deep vein thrombosis (NLDVT), and 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between predefined baseline prognostic factors and PE-LDVT or NLDVT. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between PE-LDVT or NLDVT and 90-day mortality. Results: A total of 2208 patients were included. The prevalence of any venous thromboembolism during 3 months before ICU admission was 3.6% (95% CI 2.8–4.4%). Out of 2166 patients, 47 (2.2%; 95% CI 1.6–2.9%) developed PE-LDVT and 38 patients (1.8%; 95% CI 1.2–2.4%) developed NLDVT. Renal replacement therapy (OR 3.5 95% CI 1.4–8.6), respiratory failure (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1–3.8), and previous VTE (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7–7.7) were associated with PE-LDVT. Central venous catheters (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.7–17.8) and infection (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1–4.3) were associated with NLDVT. Occurrence of PE-LDVT but not NLDVT was associated with increased 90-day mortality (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6–4.6, respectively, 0.92; 95% CI 0.41–2.1). Conclusion: Thrombotic events are common in critically ill patients, both before and after ICU admittance. Development of PE-LDVT but not NLDVT was associated with increased mortality. Prognostic factors for developing PE-LDVT or NLDVT despite prophylaxis can be identified at ICU admission and may be used to select patients at higher risk in future randomized clinical trials. Trial registration: NCT03773939.
Original languageEnglish
Article number27
JournalCritical Care
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cohort studies
  • Critical care
  • Critical illness
  • Embolism
  • Venous thromboembolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: data from two prospective cohort studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this