Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Academic Center of Evidence Based Sports Medicine, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • International Olympic Committee
  • Harvard University
  • Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital
  • New York University
  • Sport & Exercise Medicine, Fortius Clinic, London, UK
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research and Education (SCORE), Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
  • Imperial College London
  • Amsterdam Movement Sciences
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Fortius Clinic
  • Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research Education (SCORE), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Xpert Orthopaedic Surgery Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Spaarne Gasthuis Academy
  • Harvard Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors independently screened the search results, and risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. Studies on acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries with pre-operative or intra-operative imaging were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in combined and separate groups of acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries. Secondary outcomes were anatomic distribution and mean size of the (osteo)chondral lesions. RESULTS: Nine articles (402 syndesmotic injuries) were included in the final analysis. Overall (osteo)chondral lesion incidence was 20.7% (95% CI: 13.7%-29.9%). This rate was 22.0% (95% CI: 17.1-27.7) and 24.1% (95% CI: 15.6-35.2) for acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries, respectively. In the combined acute and chronic syndesmotic injury group, 95.4% of the lesions were located on the talar dome and 4.5% of the lesions were located on the distal tibia. (Osteo)chondral lesion size was not reported in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle are present in 21% of the patients with isolated syndesmotic injuries. No difference in incidence rate was found between the different syndesmotic injury types and it can be concluded that the majority of lesions are located on the talar dome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176641.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19476035221102569
JournalCartilage
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • ankle
  • incidence rate
  • isolated syndesmotic injuries
  • meta-analysis
  • osteochondral lesion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this