TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of European national driving regulations for obstructive sleep apnoea
T2 - challenges and recommendations
AU - McNicholas, Walter T.
AU - van der Werf, Ysbrand D.
AU - Hartley, Sarah
AU - Philip, Pierre
AU - Anttalainen, Ulla
AU - Basoglu, Ozen
AU - Björnsdóttir, Erla
AU - Celmiņa, Marta
AU - Dogas, Zoran
AU - Engstrøm, Morten
AU - Fanfulla, Francesco
AU - Ferreira, Daniela
AU - Hare, Alanna
AU - Heinzer, Raphael
AU - Janković, Slavko
AU - Jennum, Poul
AU - Kent, Brian
AU - Khachatryan, Samson G.
AU - Korostovtseva, Lyudmila
AU - Kunos, L. szló
AU - Lombardi, Carolina
AU - Ludka, Ondřej
AU - Merino, Milagros
AU - Mihaicuta, Stefan
AU - Mucska, Imrich
AU - Pajediene, Evelina
AU - Põld, Katrin
AU - Popovic, Rainer
AU - Randerath, Winfried
AU - Saaresranta, Tarja
AU - Sánchez-de-la-Torre, Manuel
AU - Schiza, Sophia
AU - Śliwiński, Paweł
AU - Sõõru, Erve
AU - Stražišar, Barbara Gnidovec
AU - Terziyski, Kiril
AU - Testelmans, Dries
AU - Ulander, Martin
AU - van Zeller, Mafalda
AU - Verbraecken, Johan
AU - the study collaborators in the Assembly of National Sleep Societies and other National Representatives
AU - Young, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright ©The authors 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) carries an increased risk of motor vehicle accidents, which resulted in the European Commission introducing a legal directive (2014/85/EU) restricting driving in patients with moderate/severe OSA and sleepiness, unless effectively treated. We assessed the implementation of the directive in European Union (EU) member and non-member states. Methods National sleep societies and/or selected other sleep specialists in EU member states and selected other European countries completed a questionnaire on the local introduction of the EU Directive, or similar, the OSA severity to restrict driving, criteria to resume driving, and the validity period for different driving licences. Results Data were obtained from 25 out of 27 EU member states and all eight non-member states included, representing a population of ∼770 million. All EU members had introduced the Directive into national regulations, largely unchanged, although some countries applied stricter criteria such as mild OSA and a minimum treatment period before resuming driving. Only five non-member states had driving regulations for OSA. Problems with implementation of regulations were reported in most countries, including inadequate resources to diagnose/treat OSA patients, excessive restrictions regarding disease severity and certification to resume driving, and under-reporting of symptoms by patients fearing the loss of their licence, especially professional drivers. Conclusions Driving regulations for OSA apply in most European countries, but excessively strict criteria for OSA severity, sleepiness and delayed permission to resume driving are questionable. Further research is needed on whether such regulations result in fewer accidents and on the objective identification of sleepiness.
AB - Background Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) carries an increased risk of motor vehicle accidents, which resulted in the European Commission introducing a legal directive (2014/85/EU) restricting driving in patients with moderate/severe OSA and sleepiness, unless effectively treated. We assessed the implementation of the directive in European Union (EU) member and non-member states. Methods National sleep societies and/or selected other sleep specialists in EU member states and selected other European countries completed a questionnaire on the local introduction of the EU Directive, or similar, the OSA severity to restrict driving, criteria to resume driving, and the validity period for different driving licences. Results Data were obtained from 25 out of 27 EU member states and all eight non-member states included, representing a population of ∼770 million. All EU members had introduced the Directive into national regulations, largely unchanged, although some countries applied stricter criteria such as mild OSA and a minimum treatment period before resuming driving. Only five non-member states had driving regulations for OSA. Problems with implementation of regulations were reported in most countries, including inadequate resources to diagnose/treat OSA patients, excessive restrictions regarding disease severity and certification to resume driving, and under-reporting of symptoms by patients fearing the loss of their licence, especially professional drivers. Conclusions Driving regulations for OSA apply in most European countries, but excessively strict criteria for OSA severity, sleepiness and delayed permission to resume driving are questionable. Further research is needed on whether such regulations result in fewer accidents and on the objective identification of sleepiness.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012140521
U2 - 10.1183/13993003.02484-2024
DO - 10.1183/13993003.02484-2024
M3 - Article
C2 - 40341050
SN - 0903-1936
VL - 66
JO - European respiratory journal
JF - European respiratory journal
IS - 1
M1 - 2402484
ER -