Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-181

  • Antoine Adenis
  • , Amit S. Kulkarni
  • , Gustavo C. Girotto
  • , Christelle de la Fouchardiere
  • , Helene Senellart
  • , Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
  • , Wasat Mansoor
  • , Raed Al-Rajabi
  • , Josephine Norquist
  • , Mayur Amonkar
  • , Shailaja Suryawanshi
  • , Pooja Bhagia
  • , Jean-Philippe Metges
  • Université de Montpellier
  • Merck
  • Hospital de Base
  • Centre Léon Bérard
  • Centre Georges-François Leclerc
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Kansas
  • CHU de Brest
  • Université de Montpellier 2
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE In the phase III KEYNOTE-181 study (NCT02564263) of patients with advanced esophageal cancer (EC), pembrolizumab monotherapy prolonged overall survival versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10. We present the results of the prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) analyses of the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), CPS ≥ 10, and CPS ≥ 10 SCC populations. PATIENTS AND METHODS HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ EC questionnaire (OES18), and EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Data were analyzed in patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥ 1 HRQoL assessment. Key analyses included baseline to week 9 least squares mean change in global health status/quality of life, functional or symptom subscales, and time to deterioration (≥ 10-point deterioration) for specific subscales. RESULTS The HRQoL population included 387 patients with SCC. Compliance and completion rates for all three questionnaires were similar in both treatment groups at baseline and week 9. No clinically meaningful differences in global health status/quality of life scores were observed between treatment groups from baseline to week 9 (least squares mean difference, 2.80; 95% CI, –1.48 to 7.08); patients in both treatment groups generally exhibited stable functioning and symptom scores of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 from baseline to week 9. Time to deterioration for pain (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.89), reflux (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.25), and dysphagia (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.31) subscales were similar between treatment groups. These findings were generally similar in the CPS ≥ 10 (n 5 218) and CPS ≥ 10 SCC (n 5 166) subgroups. CONCLUSION In patients with advanced EC, pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemotherapy maintained HRQoL in patients with SCC, CPS ≥ 10, and CPS ≥ 10 SCC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-391
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of clinical oncology
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-181'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this