Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of elevated lipoprotein(a) on epicardial coronary flow conductance and endoluminal atherosclerotic disease distribution

  • Mick P L Renkens
  • , Tsung-Ying Tsai
  • , Pruthvi C Revaiah
  • , Shigetaka Kageyama
  • , Johan H C Reiber
  • , Robbert J de Winter
  • , Maik Grundeken
  • , Nick S Nurmohamed
  • , Erik Stroes
  • , Scot Garg
  • , Clemens von Birgelen
  • , Sjoerd Hofma
  • , Mohammad Alkhalil
  • , Liesbeth Rosseel
  • , Faisal Sharif
  • , Pieter C Smits
  • , Andreas Baumbach
  • , Yoshinobu Onuma
  • , Joanna J Wykrzykowska
  • , Patrick W Serruys
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers
  • University of Amsterdam
  • The Netherlands
  • CORRIB Research Centre for Advanced Imaging and Core Laboratory
  • University of Galway
  • Medis Medical Imaging Systems BV
  • Department of Vascular Medicine
  • Royal Blackburn Hospital
  • University of Twente
  • Department of cardiology
  • Newcastle University
  • CERC Cardiovascular European Research Center
  • Queen Mary University of London and Barts Heart Centre
  • University Medical Center Groningen
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taichung Taiwan
  • Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital
  • Medis Medical Imaging Systems B.V.
  • East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • Medical Centre Leeuwarden
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Algemeen Stedelijk Ziekenhuis
  • Cardiovascular European Research Center
  • Maasstad Hospital
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • University of Groningen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with accelerated progression of coronary plaques, a higher prevalence of thin-cap fibroatheroma, and an increased risk of spontaneous myocardial infarction. However, Lp(a)'s impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) and the resulting coronary flow dynamics have yet to be fully determined.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of elevated Lp(a) levels on epicardial coronary flow and endoluminal disease pattern (focal or diffuse).

METHODS: In a propensity-score matched (PSM) cohort from the ongoing PIONEER IV trial (NCT04923191), participants with de novo CAD and elevated Lp(a) (>50 mg/dL or 120 nmol/L) were matched to controls based on traditional CAD risk factors. Epicardial flow velocity was assessed using the Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR), with the virtual QFR-Pressure Pullback Gradient Index (QFR-PPGi) characterizing the endoluminal disease phenotype. A QFR ≤ 0.80 indicated significant epicardial flow limitation.

RESULTS: Among 672 consecutively enrolled participants with available Lp(a) measurements, elevated levels were observed in 23 % (152/672). Complete risk profiles for traditional CAD risk factors were available for 391 participants with de novo CAD, of whom 75 had elevated Lp(a) levels. After propensity matching, 75 pairs (150 participants) were eligible for analyses. QFR analyses were completed in 392/450 (87 %) vessels. The median difference in baseline QFR between matched vessels was -0.045 (p = 0.005), while the mean difference in QFR-PPGi was -0.028 (p = 0.013). Vessels from participants with elevated Lp(a) demonstrated significantly higher rates of QFR ≤ 0.80 compared to matched controls (31 % vs. 19 %, absolute risk difference 12 %; 95 % CI: 2.7 %-21 %, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma levels of Lp(a) were associated with increased epicardial flow limitation and a more diffuse endoluminal disease pattern.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT: In this PIONEER IV sub-study (NCT04923191), we investigated the effect of elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on epicardial coronary flow and endoluminal disease distribution. We analyzed 392 vessels from 75 propensity-matched pairs using Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) to assess flow limitation and the virtual QFR-Pressure Pullback Gradient Index (QFR-PPGi) to characterize disease distribution patterns (focal versus diffuse). Vessels exposed to elevated Lp(a) exhibited significantly higher rates of epicardial flow limitation (QFR ≤ 0.80) than controls (31 % vs. 19 %, absolute risk difference 12 %; 95 % CI: 2.7 %-21 %, p = 0.011). The median difference in baseline QFR between matched vessels was -0.045 (p = 0.005), while the mean difference in QFR-PPGi was -0.028 (p = 0.013). These findings demonstrate that elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with both greater epicardial flow limitation and a more diffuse pattern of coronary artery disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-77
Number of pages11
JournalCardiovascular revascularization medicine
Volume86
Early online date2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Lipoprotein(a)/blood
  • Male
  • Female
  • Coronary Circulation
  • Coronary Artery Disease/blood
  • Middle Aged
  • Aged
  • Biomarkers/blood
  • Up-Regulation
  • Coronary Vessels/physiopathology
  • Blood Flow Velocity
  • Plaque, Atherosclerotic
  • Risk Factors
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Coronary physiology
  • Diffuse disease
  • Lipoprotein(a)
  • Revascularization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of elevated lipoprotein(a) on epicardial coronary flow conductance and endoluminal atherosclerotic disease distribution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this