Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Amsterdam UMC Home
Help & FAQ
Link opens in a new tab
Search content at Amsterdam UMC
Home
Researchers
Departments & Research Institutes
Projects & Funding
Publications
Datasets
Prizes
Activities
Courses
Cohorts
Press/Media
Impact
How to End Selective Reporting in Animal Research
Gerben ter Riet
, Lex M. Bouter
Affiliatie UvA
General Practice
APH - Aging & Later Life
APH - Personalized Medicine
University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Research output
:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
›
Chapter
›
Academic
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How to End Selective Reporting in Animal Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Selective Reporting
100%
Reporting Bias
80%
Animal Use
40%
Animal Care
40%
Statistical Significance
20%
Meta-analysis
20%
Graves
20%
Clinical Practice Guidelines
20%
Economic Impact
20%
Complete Removal
20%
Potential Harm
20%
Misinterpretation
20%
Quality Loss
20%
Text Mining
20%
Ethical Implications
20%
Human Life
20%
Healthcare Decisions
20%
First-in-man Study
20%
Funding Bodies
20%
Statistical Significance Test
20%
Comprehensive Monitoring
20%
Scientific Impact
20%
Reporting Practices
20%
Electronic System
20%
Corrupt
20%
Scientific Records
20%
Financial Conflicts of Interest
20%
Medicine and Dentistry
Meta-Analysis
100%
Base
100%
Prematurity
100%
First-in-Man Study
100%
Psychology
Meta-Analysis
100%
Conflict of Interest
100%
Neuroscience
Meta-Analysis
100%