Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Healthcare system inputs and patient-reported outcomes: a study in adults with congenital heart defect from 15 countries

  • APPROACH-IS consortium and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD)
  • KU Leuven
  • Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research
  • University of Antwerp
  • University of The Free State
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Bern
  • Department of Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Japan
  • National Taiwan University
  • Nationwide Children’s Hospital
  • University of Montreal
  • Spectrum Health
  • Pediatric Cardiology, Chennai, India
  • Division of Cardiology, Argentina
  • University of Oslo
  • University of Gothenburg
  • University West
  • Umeå University
  • University of Alberta
  • Monash University
  • Mater Dei Hospital
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Hôpital Louis Pradel
  • Adult Congenital Heart Disease Program at Stanford, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA, USA
  • Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, MO, United States
  • IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
  • University of Milan
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • University of Cape Town

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between healthcare system inputs (e.g., human resources and infrastructure) and mortality has been extensively studied. However, the association between healthcare system inputs and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Hence, we explored the predictive value of human resources and infrastructures of the countries' healthcare system on patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 3588 patients with congenital heart disease (median age = 31y; IQR = 16.0; 52% women; 26% simple, 49% moderate, and 25% complex defects) from 15 countries. The following patient-reported outcomes were measured: perceived physical and mental health, psychological distress, health behaviors, and quality of life. The assessed inputs of the healthcare system were: (i) human resources (i.e., density of physicians and nurses, both per 1000 people) and (ii) infrastructure (i.e., density of hospital beds per 10,000 people). Univariable, multivariable, and sensitivity analyses using general linear mixed models were conducted, adjusting for patient-specific variables and unmeasured country differences. RESULTS: Sensitivity analyses showed that higher density of physicians was significantly associated with better self-reported physical and mental health, less psychological distress, and better quality of life. A greater number of nurses was significantly associated with better self-reported physical health, less psychological distress, and less risky health behavior. No associations between a higher density of hospital beds and patient-reported outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This explorative study suggests that density of human resources for health, measured on country level, are associated with patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease. More research needs to be conducted before firm conclusions about the relationships observed can be drawn. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150603. Registered 30 May 2014.
Original languageEnglish
Article number496
Pages (from-to)496
JournalBMC health services research
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Congenital Heart Defects
  • Health Resources
  • Healthcare workforce
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Quality of life
  • Staffing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Healthcare system inputs and patient-reported outcomes: a study in adults with congenital heart defect from 15 countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this