TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthcare professionals’ experiences with expanded noninvasive prenatal screening
T2 - challenges and solutions
AU - Claesen-Bengtson, Zoë
AU - van der Meij, Karuna R. M.
AU - Vermeesch, Joris R.
AU - Henneman, Lidewij
AU - Borry, Pascal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal cell-free DNA screening (NIPT) can lead to the early detection of important health-related information for the fetus and pregnant woman. However, the expanding scope of screening heightens information complexity and creates challenges for clinical interactions. This study explored Belgian healthcare professionals’ experiences to identify challenges and solutions to expanded NIPT in practice. We assessed experiences of 31 healthcare professionals including clinical geneticists, gynecologists, midwives, counselors, and laboratory specialists, in Belgium where NIPT is publicly reimbursed. The interviews were analyzed inductively and iteratively. Key challenges to expanded NIPT were identified and structured under three headings: (1) Pre-test information provision: The more is tested for, the more complex the information provision becomes; (2) Return of results: Knowing more might be worse than knowing less; and (3) Hurdles that complicate setting a (nation-wide) scope. Solutions mentioned included providing additional resources for counseling, implementing value-based counseling, and a uniform scope of NIPT. To minimize potential harms and to retain trust of NIPT-users, it is crucial that best practices for counseling and reporting results are more substantiated. Sustainable lines of communication should be developed across stakeholder groups to navigate transparent implementation of technological developments in prenatal genetic screening.
AB - Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal cell-free DNA screening (NIPT) can lead to the early detection of important health-related information for the fetus and pregnant woman. However, the expanding scope of screening heightens information complexity and creates challenges for clinical interactions. This study explored Belgian healthcare professionals’ experiences to identify challenges and solutions to expanded NIPT in practice. We assessed experiences of 31 healthcare professionals including clinical geneticists, gynecologists, midwives, counselors, and laboratory specialists, in Belgium where NIPT is publicly reimbursed. The interviews were analyzed inductively and iteratively. Key challenges to expanded NIPT were identified and structured under three headings: (1) Pre-test information provision: The more is tested for, the more complex the information provision becomes; (2) Return of results: Knowing more might be worse than knowing less; and (3) Hurdles that complicate setting a (nation-wide) scope. Solutions mentioned included providing additional resources for counseling, implementing value-based counseling, and a uniform scope of NIPT. To minimize potential harms and to retain trust of NIPT-users, it is crucial that best practices for counseling and reporting results are more substantiated. Sustainable lines of communication should be developed across stakeholder groups to navigate transparent implementation of technological developments in prenatal genetic screening.
KW - Ethics
KW - Expanded NIPT
KW - Genetic counseling
KW - NIPT
KW - Noninvasive prenatal testing
KW - Qualitative research
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001483066
U2 - 10.1007/s12687-024-00751-6
DO - 10.1007/s12687-024-00751-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 39708236
SN - 1868-310X
VL - 16
SP - 91
EP - 103
JO - Journal of community genetics
JF - Journal of community genetics
IS - 1
ER -