Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Health-related quality-of-life results from the randomised phase II TAVAREC trial on temozolomide with or without bevacizumab in 1p/19q intact first-recurrence World Health Organization grade 2 and 3 glioma (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26091)

  • Jaap C. Reijneveld*
  • , Abigirl Machingura
  • , Corneel Coens
  • , Martin J. B. Taphoorn
  • , Walter Taal
  • , Paul M. Clement
  • , Ahmed Idbaih
  • , Filip Y. F. de Vos
  • , Martin Klein
  • , Wolfgang Wick
  • , Paul J. Mulholland
  • , Joanne Lewis
  • , Vassilis Golfinopoulos
  • , Irina Ghislain
  • , Andrew Bottomley
  • , Martin J. van den Bent
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Epilepsy Institutes of the Netherlands Foundation
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center
  • Leiden University
  • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
  • KU Leuven
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Utrecht University
  • Heidelberg University Hospital
  • University College London
  • Freeman Hospital
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: In an international randomised controlled phase II study of temozolomide (TMZ) versus TMZ in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) in locally diagnosed non-1p/19q co-deleted World Health Organization grade 2 or 3 gliomas with a first and contrast-enhancing recurrence after initial radiotherapy, and overall survival at 12 months was not significantly different (61% in the TMZ arm and 55% in the TMZ + BEV arm). Objectives: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was a key secondary end-point in this trial, and the main objective of this study was to determine the impact of the addition of BEV to TMZ on HRQoL. Methods: HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (version 3) and QLQ-BN20 at baseline, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression. The pre-selected primary HRQoL end-point was the QLQ-C30 global health scale, with self-perceived cognitive functioning and pain selected as secondary HRQoL issues. Analysis was undertaken using linear mixed modelling and complemented with sensitivity analyses using summary statistics. A difference was considered clinically relevant with ≥10 points difference on a 100-point scale. Results: Baseline compliance was high at 94% and remained above 60% until 72 weeks, limiting the analysis to 60 weeks. Compliance was similar in both arms. We found no statistically significant or clinically significant differences between the primary HRQoL end-point in both treatment arms (p = 0.2642). The sensitivity analyses confirmed this finding. The overall test for post-baseline differences between the two treatment arms also showed no statistically or clinically significant differences regarding the selected secondary end-point scales. Interpretation: The addition of BEV to TMZ in this patient group neither improves nor negatively impacts HRQoL.
Original languageEnglish
Article number112946
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume190
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bevacizumab
  • EORTC
  • Glioma
  • Health-related quality of life
  • RCTs
  • Temozolomide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health-related quality-of-life results from the randomised phase II TAVAREC trial on temozolomide with or without bevacizumab in 1p/19q intact first-recurrence World Health Organization grade 2 and 3 glioma (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26091)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this