TY - JOUR
T1 - Health economic outcomes and costs of CDK4/6 inhibitor use in first- versus second-line for advanced breast cancer
T2 - A cost-effectiveness analysis of the phase 3 SONIA trial
AU - Wortelboer, Noor
AU - Kent, Seamus
AU - Konings, Inge R.
AU - van Ommen-Nijhof, Annemiek
AU - van der Noort, Vincent
AU - van den Pol, Esther
AU - Guerrero Páez, Cristina
AU - van Bekkum, Marlies L.
AU - van den Berkmortel, Franchette W. P. J.
AU - Droogendijk, Helga J.
AU - Houtsma, Danny
AU - Oosterkamp, Hendrika M.
AU - van der Padt-Pruijsten, Annemieke
AU - Siemerink, Ester J. M.
AU - Tol, Jolien
AU - van Zweeden, Annette A.
AU - van Leeuwen-Stok, A. Elise
AU - Sonke, Gabe S.
AU - Jager, Agnes
AU - Blommestein, Hedwig M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors.
PY - 2025/12/9
Y1 - 2025/12/9
N2 - Background The SONIA phase 3 trial demonstrated adding cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to first-line endocrine therapy (aromatase-inhibitor) was not superior in terms of progression-free survival after two treatment lines compared to addition to second-line (fulvestrant) in patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Although critical to inform decision-making, a detailed health economic evaluation of both treatment strategies is currently lacking. Methods We estimated the cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6i use in first- versus second-line over 5 years using patient-level data. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated using EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Hospital resource use was collected while on SONIA treatment and cancer medications until the end of follow-up. Costs are presented in 2024 Euros. Outcomes were adjusted for censoring (data cut-off 1 December 2022) and several scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Estimated life-years were 3.509 [SE 0.075] versus 3.513 [SE 0.084]; difference −0.004, 95 % CI −0.232 to 0.223 in those receiving CDK4/6i in first- versus second-line, and QALYs were 2.694 [SE 0.068] versus 2.644 [SE 0.081]; difference 0.054, 95 % CI −0.143 to 0.250, respectively. Healthcare costs were higher among patients receiving CDK4/6i in first- versus second-line (€61,821 [SE 1423] versus €39,057 [SE 1513]; difference €22,764, 95 % CI €18,815 to €26,713). This was largely driven by higher CDK4/6i drug costs (€24,699, 95 % CI €21,833 to €27,564), with no differences in the costs of secondary care visits. The ICER was €423,408 per QALY gained. Scenario and sensitivity analyses showed similar results. Conclusion Delaying CDK4/6i treatment to second-line leads to large cost savings while achieving the same patient health outcomes. Trial registration: The SONIA trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03425838).
AB - Background The SONIA phase 3 trial demonstrated adding cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to first-line endocrine therapy (aromatase-inhibitor) was not superior in terms of progression-free survival after two treatment lines compared to addition to second-line (fulvestrant) in patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Although critical to inform decision-making, a detailed health economic evaluation of both treatment strategies is currently lacking. Methods We estimated the cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6i use in first- versus second-line over 5 years using patient-level data. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated using EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Hospital resource use was collected while on SONIA treatment and cancer medications until the end of follow-up. Costs are presented in 2024 Euros. Outcomes were adjusted for censoring (data cut-off 1 December 2022) and several scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Estimated life-years were 3.509 [SE 0.075] versus 3.513 [SE 0.084]; difference −0.004, 95 % CI −0.232 to 0.223 in those receiving CDK4/6i in first- versus second-line, and QALYs were 2.694 [SE 0.068] versus 2.644 [SE 0.081]; difference 0.054, 95 % CI −0.143 to 0.250, respectively. Healthcare costs were higher among patients receiving CDK4/6i in first- versus second-line (€61,821 [SE 1423] versus €39,057 [SE 1513]; difference €22,764, 95 % CI €18,815 to €26,713). This was largely driven by higher CDK4/6i drug costs (€24,699, 95 % CI €21,833 to €27,564), with no differences in the costs of secondary care visits. The ICER was €423,408 per QALY gained. Scenario and sensitivity analyses showed similar results. Conclusion Delaying CDK4/6i treatment to second-line leads to large cost savings while achieving the same patient health outcomes. Trial registration: The SONIA trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03425838).
KW - CDK4/6 inhibitors
KW - Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
KW - Health care resource use
KW - Metastatic breast cancer
KW - Quality-Adjusted Life Years
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021134527
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116051
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116051
M3 - Article
C2 - 41207182
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 231
JO - Eur. J. Cancer
JF - Eur. J. Cancer
M1 - 116051
ER -