Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology

  • Orestis Efthimiou
  • , Thomas P. A. Debray
  • , Gert van Valkenhoef
  • , Sven Trelle
  • , Klea Panayidou
  • , Karel G. M. Moons
  • , Johannes B. Reitsma
  • , Aijing Shang
  • , Georgia Salanti

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Pairwise meta-analysis is an established statistical tool for synthesizing evidence from multiple trials, but it is informative only about the relative efficacy of two specific interventions. The usefulness of pairwise meta-analysis is thus limited in real-life medical practice, where many competing interventions may be available for a certain condition and studies informing some of the pairwise comparisons may be lacking. This commonly encountered scenario has led to the development of network meta-analysis (NMA). In the last decade, several applications, methodological developments, and empirical studies in NMA have been published, and the area is thriving as its relevance to public health is increasingly recognized. This article presents a review of the relevant literature on NMA methodology aiming to pinpoint the developments that have appeared in the field. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-263
JournalResearch synthesis methods
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this