Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Geriatric Rehabilitation Inpatients Roam at Home! A Matched Cohort Study of Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Home-Based and Hospital-Based Settings

  • Keenan A. Ramsey
  • , Paula Loveland
  • , Anna G. M. Rojer
  • , Linda Denehy
  • , Rose Goonan
  • , Celia Marston
  • , Jacqueline E. Kay
  • , Jacinta Brenan
  • , Marijke C. Trappenburg
  • , Wen Kwang Lim
  • , Esmee M. Reijnierse
  • , Carel G. M. Meskers
  • , Andrea B. Maier*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam and VU Medical Center
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • University of Melbourne
  • Amstelland Hospital
  • National University of Singapore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in geriatric rehabilitation patients receiving care in the home-based compared to the hospital-based setting. Design: Observational matched cohort study. Setting and Participants: Home-based (patient's home) or hospital-based (ward) geriatric rehabilitation was delivered to inpatients within the REStORing health of acutely unwell adulTs (RESORT) observational, longitudinal cohort of the Royal Melbourne Hospital (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). Methods: Patients were asked to wear ActivPAL4 accelerometers for 1 week and were assessed by a comprehensive geriatric assessment at admission, discharge, and followed up after 3 months. Hospital-based patients were matched to home-based patients for sex and baseline physical function [Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), activities (instrumental) of daily living, and Clinical Frailty Scale]. Differences in patient characteristics and physical activity (total, standing and walking durations, number of steps and sit-to stand transitions) and sedentary behavior (total, sitting and lying durations) were assessed. Results: A total of 159 patients were included: 18 home-based [mean age: 81.9 ± 8.6 years, 38.9% female, median (interquartile range [IQR]) SPPB: 7.0 (5.0-9.0)] and 141 hospital-based [mean age: 82.9 ± 7.8 years, 57.4% female, median (IQR) SPPB: 1.0 (0.0-4.0)] patients, of whom 18 were matched [mean age: 80.1 ± 7.4 years, 38.9% female, median (IQR) SPPB: 6.5 (4.8-10.0)]. Median physical activity measures were consistently higher in home-based patients compared to the total group of hospital-based patients. After matching, physical activity measures remained >2.4 times higher and were significantly different for all measures (total physical activity, standing and walking durations, and steps) except for sit-to-stand transitions. Sedentary behaviors were similar with home-based patients spending non-significantly more time sitting but significantly less time lying than hospital-based patients (matched and total). Conclusions and Implications: Home-based inpatients are more physically active than hospital-based inpatients independent of matching for sex and baseline physical function, which supports home-based geriatric rehabilitation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2432-2439.e1
JournalJournal of the American Medical Directors Association
Volume22
Issue number12
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • accelerometry
  • aged
  • home care services
  • hospitals
  • physical activity
  • rehabilitation
  • sedentary behavior
  • subacute care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geriatric Rehabilitation Inpatients Roam at Home! A Matched Cohort Study of Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Home-Based and Hospital-Based Settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this