Abstract
Background: The Flow Index was recently developed as a bedside method based on flow waveforms to assess patient inspiratory effort during invasive mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to externally validate the Flow Index by assessing its ability to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths. Methods: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. The association between Flow Index and patient inspiratory effort (pressure generated by the respiratory muscles [ΔPmus] and pressure-time product from the start of inspiratory flow [PTPinsp]) was evaluated using linear mixed effects models. The discrimination capacity (area under the curve [AUC]) of the Flow Index to identify low and high inspiratory effort breaths was analyzed. Results: A total of 1,095 breaths from 38 subjects were included in the analysis. Flow Index had moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths (AUC of 0.73 and 0.77 for low inspiratory effort defined with ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively). Discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low (AUC of 0.68 and 0.65 for ΔPmus and PTPinsp, respectively). Conclusions: Flow Index demonstrated moderate discriminatory power in identifying low inspiratory effort breaths, whereas discriminatory power in identifying high inspiratory effort breaths was low.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1201-1206 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Respiratory care |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2025 |
Keywords
- Humans
- Male
- Female
- Middle Aged
- Respiratory Muscles/physiopathology
- Aged
- Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods
- Inhalation/physiology
- Work of Breathing/physiology
- Adult
- Respiration, Artificial/methods
- ICUs
- artificial respiration
- positive-pressure respiration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Flow Index as a Noninvasive Method to Evaluate Inspiratory Effort in Patients on Pressure Support Ventilation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver