Final comment on the debate article “ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV”

Barbara J. M. Mulder; Mikael Dellborg

doi:10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100131

Final comment on the debate article “ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV”

Barbara J. M. Mulder^*
, Mikael Dellborg

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

These debate articles show the arguments “pro” and “con” ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV. They illuminate the weak evidence for either recommendation, due to a lack of large randomized trials (RTCs).

Original language	English
Article number	100131
Journal	International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease
Volume	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100131
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2021

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100131

Cite this

@article{af0d7e33e41847d5aad712379a7cd057,

title = "Final comment on the debate article “ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV”",

abstract = "These debate articles show the arguments “pro” and “con” ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV. They illuminate the weak evidence for either recommendation, due to a lack of large randomized trials (RTCs).",

author = "Mulder, \{Barbara J. M.\} and Mikael Dellborg",

year = "2021",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100131",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

journal = "International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease",

issn = "2666-6685",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Final comment on the debate article “ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV”

AU - Mulder, Barbara J. M.

AU - Dellborg, Mikael

PY - 2021/5/1

Y1 - 2021/5/1

N2 - These debate articles show the arguments “pro” and “con” ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV. They illuminate the weak evidence for either recommendation, due to a lack of large randomized trials (RTCs).

AB - These debate articles show the arguments “pro” and “con” ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV. They illuminate the weak evidence for either recommendation, due to a lack of large randomized trials (RTCs).

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208516116

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100131

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100131

M3 - Editorial

SN - 2666-6685

VL - 3

JO - International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease

JF - International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease

M1 - 100131

ER -

Final comment on the debate article “ICD implantation as primary prevention in systemic RV”

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this