TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility and clinical potential of exercise interventions during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal and rectal cancer
AU - Mast, Isa H
AU - Gootjes, Elske C
AU - Rütten, Heidi
AU - den Hartogh, Mariska D
AU - Brouwer, Calvin G
AU - Nagtegaal, Iris D
AU - van der Post, Rachel S
AU - Hopman, Maria T E
AU - Heuvel, Baukje van den
AU - Rosman, Camiel
AU - de Wilt, Johannes H W
AU - Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R
AU - Buffart, Laurien M
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: Exercise during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has potential to mitigate treatment-related declines in physical fitness, and to improve clinical outcomes, including toxicity and tumor response. However, optimal frequency and timing of exercise remains to be determined. Therefore, this pilot trial aimed to assess feasibility of 2 different exercise interventions during NCRT in patients with esophageal and rectal cancer and to evaluate potential clinical effects. Methods: Patients were randomized into 1 of 3 study arms during NCRT: (a) 30-min aerobic exercise in-hospital within 1 h prior to each radiotherapy fraction (ExPR), (b) two 60-min supervised combined aerobic and resistance exercise sessions per week (AE + RE), and (c) usual care (UC). Feasibility was assessed by examining participation rate and exercise adherence. Intervention effects on physical fitness, health-related quality of life, treatment-related toxicity, and tumor response in patients with esophageal cancer were explored using regression analyses and 85% confidence intervals (85%CIs). Results: Thirty-seven patients with esophageal cancer (participation rate = 45%) and 2 patients with rectal cancer (participation rate = 14%) were included. Median session attendance was 98% (interquartile range (IQR): 96%–100%) in the ExPR and 78% (IQR: 33%–100%) in the AE + RE group. We found clinically relevant benefits of exercise on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max, mL/kg/min)(ExPR: β = 9.7, 85%CI: 6.9–12.6; AE + RE: β = 5.6, 85%CI: 2.6–8.5) and treatment-related toxicity (ExPR: β = –2.8, 85%CI: –5.4 to –0.2; AE + RE: β = –2.6, 85%CI: –5.3 to 0.0). Additionally, good tumor response was found in 70% in AE + RE and ExPR vs. 55% in UC (odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 85%CI: 0.5–7.7). Conclusion: Starting prehabilitation during NCRT is feasible, can increase starting fitness of traditional pre-surgical programs, and has potential to improve clinical outcomes.
AB - Background: Exercise during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has potential to mitigate treatment-related declines in physical fitness, and to improve clinical outcomes, including toxicity and tumor response. However, optimal frequency and timing of exercise remains to be determined. Therefore, this pilot trial aimed to assess feasibility of 2 different exercise interventions during NCRT in patients with esophageal and rectal cancer and to evaluate potential clinical effects. Methods: Patients were randomized into 1 of 3 study arms during NCRT: (a) 30-min aerobic exercise in-hospital within 1 h prior to each radiotherapy fraction (ExPR), (b) two 60-min supervised combined aerobic and resistance exercise sessions per week (AE + RE), and (c) usual care (UC). Feasibility was assessed by examining participation rate and exercise adherence. Intervention effects on physical fitness, health-related quality of life, treatment-related toxicity, and tumor response in patients with esophageal cancer were explored using regression analyses and 85% confidence intervals (85%CIs). Results: Thirty-seven patients with esophageal cancer (participation rate = 45%) and 2 patients with rectal cancer (participation rate = 14%) were included. Median session attendance was 98% (interquartile range (IQR): 96%–100%) in the ExPR and 78% (IQR: 33%–100%) in the AE + RE group. We found clinically relevant benefits of exercise on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max, mL/kg/min)(ExPR: β = 9.7, 85%CI: 6.9–12.6; AE + RE: β = 5.6, 85%CI: 2.6–8.5) and treatment-related toxicity (ExPR: β = –2.8, 85%CI: –5.4 to –0.2; AE + RE: β = –2.6, 85%CI: –5.3 to 0.0). Additionally, good tumor response was found in 70% in AE + RE and ExPR vs. 55% in UC (odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 85%CI: 0.5–7.7). Conclusion: Starting prehabilitation during NCRT is feasible, can increase starting fitness of traditional pre-surgical programs, and has potential to improve clinical outcomes.
KW - Aerobic capacity
KW - Esophageal cancer
KW - Exercise intervention
KW - Treatment-related toxicity
KW - Tumor response
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016170540
U2 - 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101060
DO - 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101060
M3 - Article
C2 - 40419137
SN - 2213-2961
VL - 14
SP - 101060
JO - Journal of sport and health science
JF - Journal of sport and health science
M1 - 101060
ER -