Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Extended fragrance ingredients surveillance study (EFISS)—protocol for a clinical surveillance study on contact allergy to 7 fragrance materials in widespread use but hitherto not systematically patch tested

  • Wolfgang Uter*
  • , Ana Carolina Figueiredo
  • , Anna Belloni Fortina
  • , John Bourke
  • , Jim Bridges
  • , Margarida Gonçalo
  • , Stamatis Gregoriou
  • , Claudia Lang
  • , Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić
  • , Joseph Huggard
  • , Marléne Isaksson
  • , Karl-Heinz Jöckel
  • , Ian Kimber
  • , Dimitra Koumaki
  • , Elena Pezzolo
  • , Thomas Rustemeyer
  • , Marie L. A. Schuttelaar
  • , Cecilia Svedman
  • , Matthias Vey
  • , Ian White
  • Anna Zambello, Magnus Bruze
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • University of Coimbra
  • University of Padua
  • University College Cork
  • University of Surrey
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • University of Zurich
  • University of Zagreb
  • The Huggard Consulting Group
  • Lund University
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • University of Manchester
  • Heraklion University Hospital
  • Azienda Sanitaria Ulss 6 Vicenza
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • University of Groningen
  • IFRA VP Scientific Affairs and IDEA Management Team
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Contact allergy (CA) is not uncommon in the population, including to various fragrance allergens. If not diagnosed correctly, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) may ensue, because targeted allergen avoidance is not possible. The primary objective of the study is to estimate the prevalence of CA to seven fragrance materials in patients with suspected ACD across Europe. Based on the outcome, a conclusion will be drawn as to whether present risk management regarding maximum recommended concentrations of each of these, based on quantitative risk assessment (QRA2), is adequate. The planned study is a surveillance study based on consecutive patients, patch tested in 10 European departments of dermatology with a series of allergens as indicated by their personal history, including the European baseline series, supplemented with the seven additional fragrance ingredients. The patch test procedure will follow the guideline of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) with additional standardization procedures. The envisaged sample size is 8100; recruitment will be in three data cycles with brief intervals allowing for descriptive interim analyses. Those patients reacting positively to any of the study allergens will be followed-up specifically to identify the source of sensitizing and/or eliciting exposure(s). Results will inform risk reassessment and subsequent risk management measures. Study results will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed scientific journal. Structured post-marketing surveillance of consumer risk of contact allergy by monitoring prevalences of positive patch test reactions in a dedicated European expert network is developed which can serve as a model for further chemicals. Important outcomes will be either a confirmation of effectiveness of risk management measures in place, or alternatively identifying aspects needing improvement (for certain cosmetic product categories). DRKS registration (DRKS00033263) 16.09.2024, mirrored at https://trialsearch.who.int
Original languageEnglish
Article number778
JournalArchives of Dermatological Research
Volume317
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Contact allergy
  • Cross-sectional study
  • Epidemiological surveillance
  • Fragrance ingredients

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extended fragrance ingredients surveillance study (EFISS)—protocol for a clinical surveillance study on contact allergy to 7 fragrance materials in widespread use but hitherto not systematically patch tested'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this