Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring the need for a preload on the estimation of permeability, vessel radius, and relative cerebral blood volume in MR vascular fingerprinting–based dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging

  • Daniëlle van Dorth*
  • , Krishnapriya Venugopal
  • , Karen N. van der Werff
  • , Marion Smits
  • , Esther A. H. Warnert
  • , Juan A. Hernandez-Tamames
  • , Matthias J. P. van Osch
  • , Dirk H. J. Poot
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Medical Delta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is commonly part of the clinical brain tumor imaging protocol. Usually, a preload of contrast agent is administered to minimize contrast-leakage T1 effects. However, recent studies have indicated that with adaptation of scan parameters (in particular, low flip angle), a preload is not required. For advanced approaches, like MR vascular fingerprinting (MRVF), which is based on combining gradient-echo and spin-echo readouts, excitation flip angles cannot easily be reduced, but postprocessing might alleviate leakage effects. In this study, the aim was to verify whether DSC-MRVF can be performed without preload. Methods: A previously established simulation model was used to create a dictionary of DSC-MRVF signals resulting from a double-bolus injection with varying input values for permeability, vessel radius, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). A sensitivity analysis based on a Cramer Rao Lower Bound approach was performed, from which the logarithmic ratio of standard deviations for parameter estimation was derived. A ratio above zero corresponded with a better determination without preload. Two brain tumor patients were included for validation. Results: The results show that the standard deviation for determining permeability was lower without preload, whereas for determining rCBV, the opposite result was found. For vessel radius, the standard deviation was similar with and without preload. The in vivo data reasonably agreed with the simulation results. Conclusion: This work has shown the potential of DSC-MRVF with a single bolus injection for determining vessel radius and permeability, although for rCBV, a preload is still advisable.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMagnetic resonance in medicine
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring the need for a preload on the estimation of permeability, vessel radius, and relative cerebral blood volume in MR vascular fingerprinting–based dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this