Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients. Part 1: the choice of resuscitation fluids

  • Yaseen M. Arabi*
  • , Emilie Belley-Cote
  • , Andrea Carsetti
  • , Daniel de Backer
  • , Katia Donadello
  • , Nicole P. Juffermans
  • , Naomi Hammond
  • , Jon Henrik Laake
  • , Dawei Liu
  • , Kathryn Maitland
  • , Antonio Messina
  • , Morten Hylander Møller
  • , Daniele Poole
  • , Rob Mac Sweeney
  • , Jean-Louis Vincent
  • , Fernando G. Zampieri
  • , European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • King Abdulaziz Medical City - Riyadh
  • McMaster University
  • Marche Polytechnic University
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • University of Verona
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • The George Institute for Global Health
  • Royal North Shore Hospital
  • University of Oslo
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Imperial College London
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • Humanitas University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Azienda ULSS n. 1 Dolomiti
  • Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast
  • University of Alberta
  • United Arab Emirates University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1939 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This is the first of three parts of the clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) on resuscitation fluids in adult critically ill patients. This part addresses fluid choice and the other two will separately address fluid amount and fluid removal. Methods: This guideline was formulated by an international panel of clinical experts and methodologists. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence and to move from evidence to decision. Results: For volume expansion, the guideline provides conditional recommendations for using crystalloids rather than albumin in critically ill patients in general (moderate certainty of evidence), in patients with sepsis (moderate certainty of evidence), in patients with acute respiratory failure (very low certainty of evidence) and in patients in the perioperative period and patients at risk for bleeding (very low certainty of evidence). There is a conditional recommendation for using isotonic saline rather than albumin in patients with traumatic brain injury (very low certainty of evidence). There is a conditional recommendation for using albumin rather than crystalloids in patients with cirrhosis (very low certainty of evidence). The guideline provides conditional recommendations for using balanced crystalloids rather than isotonic saline in critically ill patients in general (low certainty of evidence), in patients with sepsis (low certainty of evidence) and in patients with kidney injury (very low certainty of evidence). There is a conditional recommendation for using isotonic saline rather than balanced crystalloids in patients with traumatic brain injury (very low certainty of evidence). There is a conditional recommendation for using isotonic crystalloids rather than small-volume hypertonic crystalloids in critically ill patients in general (very low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: This guideline provides eleven recommendations to inform clinicians on resuscitation fluid choice in critically ill patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)813-831
Number of pages19
JournalIntensive care medicine
Volume50
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Albumin
  • Colloid solutions
  • Critical care
  • Crystalloid solutions
  • Fluid therapy
  • Practice guidelines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'European Society of Intensive Care Medicine clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients. Part 1: the choice of resuscitation fluids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this