Abstract
On page 293, in Box 4 under the section ‘Measurement error’, the descriptions of an edge with high measurement error and low measurement error are erroneously switched. The correct version reads: ‘Two edges eij and euv with respectively high measurement error (low test–retest reliability ρij = 0.25) and low measurement error (high reliability, ρuv = 0.81) can show substantial differences in power.’ Additionally, on page 285, part of a sentence was accidentally omitted in the PDF version of the article. The full sentence reads: “It is important to note, however, that there is no such thing as a ‘free lunch’ when it comes to power in connectivity and network studies.”
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1145 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Trends in cognitive sciences |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Early online date | 2024 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Statistical power in network neuroscience: (Trends in Cognitive Sciences 27:3 p:282–301, 2023) (Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2023) 27(3) (282–301), (S136466132200328X), (10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.011))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver