Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Erratum: Statistical power in network neuroscience: (Trends in Cognitive Sciences 27:3 p:282–301, 2023) (Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2023) 27(3) (282–301), (S136466132200328X), (10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.011))

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

On page 293, in Box 4 under the section ‘Measurement error’, the descriptions of an edge with high measurement error and low measurement error are erroneously switched. The correct version reads: ‘Two edges eij and euv with respectively high measurement error (low test–retest reliability ρij = 0.25) and low measurement error (high reliability, ρuv = 0.81) can show substantial differences in power.’ Additionally, on page 285, part of a sentence was accidentally omitted in the PDF version of the article. The full sentence reads: “It is important to note, however, that there is no such thing as a ‘free lunch’ when it comes to power in connectivity and network studies.”
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1145
Number of pages1
JournalTrends in cognitive sciences
Volume28
Issue number12
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Statistical power in network neuroscience: (Trends in Cognitive Sciences 27:3 p:282–301, 2023) (Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2023) 27(3) (282–301), (S136466132200328X), (10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.011))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this