Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465)

Marlies Noordzij; Merel van Diepen; Fergus C. Caskey; Kitty J. Jager

doi:10.1093/ndt/gfab291

Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465)

Marlies Noordzij
, Merel van Diepen
, Fergus C. Caskey
, Kitty J. Jager

University of Amsterdam
Leiden University Medical Center
Intensive Care Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, Bristol, UK

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the originally published version of this manuscript, the following brackets were missing in Box 1, which affects the data of the paper: Risk at 1 year after inclusion in exposed group (R1) = a/(a + b) Risk at 1 year after inclusion in unexposed group (R0) = c/(c + d) These details have been corrected only in this erratum to preserve the published version of record.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1001
Number of pages	1
Journal	Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
Volume	37
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab291
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2022

Access to Document

10.1093/ndt/gfab291

Erratum.pdfFinal published version, 116 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Noordzij, M., van Diepen, M., Caskey, F. C., & Jager, K. J. (2022). Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465). Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 37(5), 1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab291

Noordzij, Marlies ; van Diepen, Merel ; Caskey, Fergus C. et al. / Erratum : Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465). In: Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2022 ; Vol. 37, No. 5. pp. 1001.

@article{b37265ef685d4aeaa3cdb4d2b375e587,

title = "Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465)",

abstract = "In the originally published version of this manuscript, the following brackets were missing in Box 1, which affects the data of the paper: Risk at 1 year after inclusion in exposed group (R1) = a/(a + b) Risk at 1 year after inclusion in unexposed group (R0) = c/(c + d) These details have been corrected only in this erratum to preserve the published version of record.",

author = "Marlies Noordzij and \{van Diepen\}, Merel and Caskey, \{Fergus C.\} and Jager, \{Kitty J.\}",

year = "2022",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/ndt/gfab291",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "1001",

journal = "Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association",

issn = "0931-0509",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "5",

}

Noordzij, M, van Diepen, M, Caskey, FC & Jager, KJ 2022, 'Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465)', Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfab291

Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465). / Noordzij, Marlies; van Diepen, Merel; Caskey, Fergus C. et al.
In: Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, Vol. 37, No. 5, 01.05.2022, p. 1001.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465)

AU - Noordzij, Marlies

AU - van Diepen, Merel

AU - Caskey, Fergus C.

AU - Jager, Kitty J.

PY - 2022/5/1

Y1 - 2022/5/1

N2 - In the originally published version of this manuscript, the following brackets were missing in Box 1, which affects the data of the paper: Risk at 1 year after inclusion in exposed group (R1) = a/(a + b) Risk at 1 year after inclusion in unexposed group (R0) = c/(c + d) These details have been corrected only in this erratum to preserve the published version of record.

AB - In the originally published version of this manuscript, the following brackets were missing in Box 1, which affects the data of the paper: Risk at 1 year after inclusion in exposed group (R1) = a/(a + b) Risk at 1 year after inclusion in unexposed group (R0) = c/(c + d) These details have been corrected only in this erratum to preserve the published version of record.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85129345109

U2 - 10.1093/ndt/gfab291

DO - 10.1093/ndt/gfab291

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 35134977

SN - 0931-0509

VL - 37

SP - 1001

JO - Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association

JF - Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association

IS - 5

ER -

Noordzij M, van Diepen M, Caskey FC, Jager KJ. Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465). Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2022 May 1;37(5):1001. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab291

Erratum: Relative risk versus absolute risk: One cannot be interpreted without the other (Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw465)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this