Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Endothelial shear stress and vascular remodeling in bioresorbable scaffold and metallic stent

  • Erhan Tenekecioglu
  • , Yuki Katagiri
  • , Kuniaki Takahashi
  • , Mariusz Tomaniak
  • , Dariusz Dudek
  • , Angel Cequier
  • , Didier Carrié
  • , Andrés Iñiguez
  • , Rinse Johannes van der Schaaf
  • , Marcello Dominici
  • , Ad J. van Boven
  • , Steffen Helqvist
  • , Manel Sabaté
  • , Andreas Baumbach
  • , Jan J. Piek
  • , Joanna J. Wykrzykowska
  • , Pieter Kitslaar
  • , Jouke Dijkstra
  • , Johan H. C. Reiber
  • , Bernard Chevalier
  • Dilek Ural, Kerem Pekkan, Christos V. Bourantas, Frank Gijsen, Yoshinobu Onuma, Ryo Torii, Patrick W. Serruys*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Medical University of Warsaw
  • Jagiellonian University in Kraków
  • University of Barcelona
  • Hôpital de Rangueil
  • Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • S Maria University Hospital, Terni, Italy
  • Medical Centre Leeuwarden
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • Leiden University
  • Department of Cardiology, Ramsay Generale de Sante, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Hopital Prive Jacques Cartier, Massy, France
  • Koc University
  • University College London Hospitals, London, UK
  • Barts Health NHS Trust
  • University College London
  • Imperial College London
  • University of Galway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background and aims: The impact of endothelial shear stress (ESS) on vessel remodeling in vessels implanted with bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) as compared to metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) remains elusive. The aim of this study was to determine whether the relationship between ESS and remodeling patterns differs in BRS from those seen in metallic DES at 3-year follow-up. Methods: In the ABSORB II randomized trial, lesions were investigated by serial coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Three-dimensional reconstructions of coronary arteries post-procedure and at 3 years were performed. ESS was quantified using non-Newtonian steady flow simulation. IVUS cross-sections in device segment were matched using identical landmarks. Results: Paired ESS calculations post-procedure and at 3 years were feasible in 57 lesions in 56 patients. Post-procedure, median ESS at frame level was higher in BRS than in DES, with marginal statistical significance (0.97 ± 0.48 vs. 0.75 ± 0.39 Pa, p = 0.063). In the BRS arm, vessel area and lumen area showed larger increases in the highest tercile of median ESS post-procedure as compared to the lowest tercile. In contrast, in DES, no significant relationship between median ESS post-procedure and remodeling was observed. In multivariate analysis, smaller vessel area, larger lumen area, higher plaque burden post-procedure, and higher median ESS post-procedure were independently associated with expansive remodeling in matched frames. Only in BRS, younger age was an additional significant predictor of expansive remodeling. Conclusions: In a subset of lesions with large plaque burden, shear stress could be associated with expansive remodeling and late lumen enlargement in BRS, while ESS had no impact on vessel dimension in metallic DES.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-89
Number of pages11
JournalAtherosclerosis
Volume312
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Bioresorbable scaffold
  • Shear stress
  • Stenting
  • Vessel remodeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endothelial shear stress and vascular remodeling in bioresorbable scaffold and metallic stent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this