Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide on β-Cell Function, Insulin Sensitivity, and Glucose Control During a Meal Test

  • Kieren J. Mather*
  • , Andrea Mari
  • , Tim Heise
  • , J. Hans DeVries
  • , Ming Hua
  • , Shweta Urva
  • , Tamer Coskun
  • , Axel Haupt
  • , Robert J. Heine
  • , Edward Pratt
  • , Melissa K. Thomas
  • , Zvonko Milicevic
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Eli Lilly
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Profil Institute for Metabolic Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

166 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Context: In a clinical study, tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GIP/GLP-1RA), provided superior glycemic control vs the GLP-1RA semaglutide. The physiologic mechanisms are incompletely understood. Objective: This work aimed to evaluate treatment effects by model-based analyses of mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) data. Methods: A 28-week double–blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin was conducted at 2 clinical research centers in Germany. Interventions included tirzepatide 15 mg, semaglutide 1 mg, and placebo. Main outcome measures included glycemic control, model-derived β-cell function indices including insulin secretion rate (ISR) at 7.2–mmol/L glucose (ISR7.2), β-cell glucose sensitivity (β-CGS), insulin sensitivity, and estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio. Results: Tirzepatide significantly reduced fasting glucose and MMTT total glucose area under the curve (AUC) vs semaglutide (P < .01). Incremental glucose AUC did not differ significantly between treatments; therefore, greater total glucose AUC reduction with tirzepatide was mainly attributable to greater suppression of fasting glucose. A greater reduction in total ISR AUC was achieved with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01), in the context of greater improvement in insulin sensitivity with tirzepatide (P < .01). ISR7.2 was significantly increased with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .05), showing improved β-CGS. MMTT-derived β-CGS was increased but not significantly different between treatments. Both treatments reduced fasting glucagon and total glucagon AUC, with glucagon AUC significantly reduced with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (P < .01). The estimated hepatic insulin-to-glucagon ratio did not change substantially with either treatment. Conclusion: These results suggest that the greater glycemic control observed for tirzepatide manifests as improved fasting glucose and glucose excursion control, due to improvements in ISR, insulin sensitivity, and glucagon suppression.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3046-3054
JournalJournal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Volume109
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide on β-Cell Function, Insulin Sensitivity, and Glucose Control During a Meal Test'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this