Abstract
The effectiveness of return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain on work absenteeism, pain severity, and functional status was examined by means of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Publications in English that met the selection criteria were identified in a computer-aided search and assessed for methodological quality. A best-evidence synthesis was performed instead of statistical data pooling, because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and study populations. Five of nine studies comparing return-to-work intervention with usual care were identified as methodologically high-quality studies. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of return to work intervention on the return-to-work rate after 6 months and for the effectiveness of return-to-work intervention on the reduction of days of absence from work after > or = 12 months. It can be concluded that return-to-work interventions are equal or more effective regarding absence from work due to subacute low-back pain than usual care is.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 249-57 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2005 |
Keywords
- Behavior Therapy/methods
- Ergonomics
- Humans
- Low Back Pain/psychology
- Patient Education as Topic
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Rehabilitation, Vocational/methods
- Severity of Illness Index
- Sick Leave
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver