Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a mental health stepped-care programme for healthcare workers with psychological distress in crisis settings: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

  • RESPOND Consortium
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)
  • Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
  • Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research
  • Teaching Research and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
  • Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
  • University of Verona
  • Department of Clinical,Neuro and Developmental Psychology,VU University Amsterdam,the Netherlands.
  • Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam and VU Medical Center
  • University of New South Wales
  • University Medical Centre Mainz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based mental health interventions to support healthcare workers (HCWs) in crisis settings are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the capacity of a mental health intervention in reducing anxiety and depression symptoms in HCWs, relative to enhanced care as usual (eCAU), amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an analyst-blind, parallel, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. We recruited HCWs with psychological distress from Madrid and Catalonia (Spain). The intervention arm received a stepped-care programme consisting of two WHO-developed interventions adapted for HCWs: Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM) and Problem Management Plus (PM+). Each intervention lasted 5 weeks and was delivered remotely by non-specialist mental health providers. HCWs reporting psychological distress after DWM completion were invited to continue to PM+. The primary endpoint was self-reported anxiety/depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety and Depression Scale) at week 21. FINDINGS: Between 3 November 2021 and 31 March 2022, 115 participants were randomised to stepped care and 117 to eCAU (86% women, mean age 37.5). The intervention showed a greater decrease in anxiety/depression symptoms compared with eCAU at the primary endpoint (baseline-adjusted difference 4.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 6.7; standardised effect size 0.8, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Brief stepped-care psychological interventions reduce anxiety and depression during a period of stress among HCWs. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our results can inform policies and actions to protect the mental health of HCWs during major health crises and are potentially rapidly replicable in other settings where workers are affected by global emergencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04980326.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Mental Health
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • adult psychiatry
  • anxiety disorders
  • depression & mood disorders

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of a mental health stepped-care programme for healthcare workers with psychological distress in crisis settings: a multicentre randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this