Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a digital alcohol intervention as an add-on to depression treatment for young adults: Results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

  • Arkin Mental Health Care Institute
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University of Zurich
  • Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Problematic drinking frequently co-occurs with depression among young adults, but often remains unaddressed in depression treatment. Evidence is insufficient on whether digital alcohol interventions can be effective in this young comorbid population. In a randomized controlled trial, we examined the effectiveness of Beating the Booze (BtB), an add-on digital alcohol intervention to complement depression treatment for young adults. Methods Participants were randomized to BtB + depression treatment as usual (BTB + TAU, n = 81) or TAU (n = 82). The primary outcome was treatment response, a combined measure for alcohol and depression after 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were number of weekly drinks (Timeline Follow-back) and depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale). Treatment response was analyzed using generalized linear modeling and secondary outcomes using robust linear mixed modeling. Results Low treatment response was found due to lower than expected depression remission rates. No statistically significant between-group effect was found for treatment response after 6-month follow-up (odds ratio 2.86, p = 0.089, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-9.63). For our secondary outcomes, statistically significant larger reductions in weekly drinks were found in the intervention group after 3-month (B = -4.00, p = 0.009, 95% CI -6.97 to -1.02, d = 0.27) and 6-month follow-up (B = -3.20, p = 0.032, 95% CI -6.13 to -0.27, d = 0.23). We found no statistically significant between-group differences on depressive symptoms after 3-month (B = -0.57, p = 0.732, 95% CI -3.83 to 2.69) nor after 6-month follow-up (B = -0.44, p = 0.793, 95% CI -3.69 to 2.82). Conclusions The add-on digital alcohol intervention was effective in reducing alcohol use, but not in reducing depressive symptoms and treatment response among young adults with co-occurring depressive disorders and problematic alcohol use. Trial registration: Pre-registered on October 29, 2019 in the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON), formerly the Dutch Trial Register(https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/49219).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2887-2898
Number of pages13
JournalPsychological medicine
Volume54
Issue number11
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • comorbidity
  • depression
  • digital intervention
  • effectiveness
  • ehealth
  • problematic alcohol use
  • randomized controlled trial
  • treatment
  • young adults

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of a digital alcohol intervention as an add-on to depression treatment for young adults: Results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this