Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of Low-Intensity Physical Activity and Moderate- to High-Intensity Physical Exercise During Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Physical Fitness, Fatigue, and Chemotherapy Completion Rates: Results of the PACES Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Hanna van Waart
  • , Martijn M. Stuiver
  • , Wim H. van Harten
  • , Edwin Geleijn
  • , Jacobien M. Kieffer
  • , Laurien M. Buffart
  • , Marianne de Maaker-Berkhof
  • , Epie Boven
  • , Jolanda Schrama
  • , Maud M. Geenen
  • , Jetske M. Meerum Terwogt
  • , Aart van Bochove
  • , Vera Lustig
  • , Simone M. van den Heiligenberg
  • , Carolien H. Smorenburg
  • , Jeannette A. J. H. Hellendoorn-van Vreeswijk
  • , Gabe S. Sonke
  • , Neil K. Aaronson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

145 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of a low-intensity, home-based physical activity program (Onco-Move) and a moderate- to high-intensity, combined supervised resistance and aerobic exercise program (OnTrack) versus usual care (UC) in maintaining or enhancing physical fitness, minimizing fatigue, enhancing health-related quality of life, and optimizing chemotherapy completion rates in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. We randomly assigned patients who were scheduled to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 230) to Onco-Move, OnTrack, or UC. Performance-based and self-reported outcomes were assessed before random assignment, at the end of chemotherapy, and at the 6-month follow-up. We used generalized estimating equations to compare the groups over time. Onco-Move and OnTrack resulted in less decline in cardiorespiratory fitness (P <.001), better physical functioning (P ≤ .001), less nausea and vomiting (P = .029 and .031, respectively) and less pain (P = .003 and .011, respectively) compared with UC. OnTrack also resulted in better outcomes for muscle strength (P = .002) and physical fatigue (P <.001). At the 6-month follow-up, most outcomes returned to baseline levels for all three groups. A smaller percentage of participants in OnTrack required chemotherapy dose adjustments than those in the UC or Onco-Move groups (P = .002). Both intervention groups returned earlier (P = .012), as well as for more hours per week (P = .014), to work than the control group. A supervised, moderate- to high-intensity, combined resistance and aerobic exercise program is most effective for patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. A home-based, low-intensity physical activity program represents a viable alternative for women who are unable or unwilling to follow the higher intensity program
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1918-1927
JournalJournal of clinical oncology
Volume33
Issue number17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Low-Intensity Physical Activity and Moderate- to High-Intensity Physical Exercise During Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Physical Fitness, Fatigue, and Chemotherapy Completion Rates: Results of the PACES Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this