Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a modified informed-consent procedure, in which permission is requested to send a questionnaire and to provide all the information about the study only after it is completed, would raise objections from patients who were asked to participate in a study on satisfaction with the follow-up care after a cerebrovascular accident. DESIGN: Descriptive cohort study. METHOD: 123 patients were approached for the randomised study. The patients who were included were interviewed by telephone two weeks after they had been sent the postponed information. RESULTS: During recruitment, 5 patients refused to participate but this was not because of the modified procedure. Of the 112 survivors, 102 (91%) could be interviewed and 79 had read the letter. Nobody (0%; 95% CI: 0-5) said that their trust in doctors had decreased; one patient (1%; 95% CI: 0-7) indicated decreased willingness to participate in future studies; two patients (3%; 95% CI: 0-9) were dissatisfied about the procedure followed. CONCLUSION: The participants in the trial had no major objections to the modified informed-consent procedure in which full information was given only after their participation had ended. Furthermore, patients did not refuse participation because of the modified procedure
| Original language | Dutch |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-32 |
| Journal | Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde |
| Volume | 149 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver