Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Early vs Late Anticoagulation After Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Covert Brain Infarcts

  • Markus Kneihsl
  • , Arsany Hakim
  • , Martina B. Goeldlin
  • , Thomas R. Meinel
  • , Mattia Branca
  • , Roman Rohner
  • , Sabine Fenzl
  • , Stefanie Abend
  • , Gek C. Shim
  • , Christoph Gumbinger
  • , Liqun Zhang
  • , Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen
  • , Philippe Desfontaines
  • , Peter Vanacker
  • , Angelika Alonso
  • , Sven Poli
  • , Ana Paiva Nunes
  • , Nicoletta G. Caracciolo
  • , Thomas Gattringer
  • , Timo Kahles
  • Daria Giudici, Jelle Demeestere, ELAN investigators
  • Medical University of Graz
  • University of Basel
  • University of Bern
  • County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
  • Heidelberg University 
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Oslo
  • CHC MontLegia
  • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Groeninge Kortrijk
  • University of Antwerp
  • University of Tübingen
  • Central Lisbon University Hospital Center, EPE (CHULC)
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Cantonal Hospital Aarau
  • University of Perugia
  • KU Leuven
  • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and Objective: sCovert brain infarcts (CBIs) in patients with first-ever ischemic stroke (IS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with an increased risk of stroke recurrence. We aimed to assess whether CBIs modify the treatment effect of early vs late initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with IS and AF. Methods We conducted a post hoc analysis of the international, multicenter, randomized-controlled ELAN trial, which compared early (<48 hours after ischemic stroke for minor and moderate stroke, 6-7 days for major stroke) vs late (>48 hours for minor, 3-4 days for moderate, 12-14 days for major stroke) initiation of DOACs in patients with IS and AF. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent IS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), major extracranial bleeding, systemic embolism, or vascular death within 30 days after stroke; secondary outcomes were the individual components. We estimated outcomes based on the presence of CBIs (any CBI vs no CBI) on prerandomization imaging (core-lab rating) using adjusted risk differences (aRDs) between treatment arms. Point estimates and 95% CIs are presented without reporting p values. Results Of the 1,694 participants with first-ever IS included (median age: 77 years, 45.9% female), 678 (40.0%) had CBI. The imaging core-lab interrater reliability for the presence of CBI was 0.87 (0.81-0.94). The primary outcome occurred in 8 (2.3%; recurrent IS: 3/342) of 342 participants with CBI assigned to the early treatment arm vs 20 (6.0%; recurrent IS: 12/336) of 336 assigned to the late treatment arm (aRD: -3.6%, 95% CI -6.6 to -0.6) (p for interaction: 0.063). With early DOAC treatment, IS recurrence risk was lower in participants with CBI (aRD: -2.7%, 95% CI -5.0 to -0.4), but not in participants without CBI (aRD: -0.4, 95% CI -2.1 to 1.2). No sICH was observed in the early treatment group.DiscussionThe presence of CBI may indicate a subgroup of patients with first-ever IS and AF who particularly benefits from early DOAC initiation to prevent ischemic event recurrence, without increasing harm. Our findings should be considered in clinical decision making regarding timely DOAC treatment in patients with stroke and AF.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere210157
Pages (from-to)e210157
JournalNeurology
Volume104
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early vs Late Anticoagulation After Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Covert Brain Infarcts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this