Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dutch post-graduate training in Global Health and Tropical Medicine: a qualitative study on graduates’ perspectives

  • Isabelle G. Tiggelaar*
  • , Erica W. M. Janszen
  • , Marianne van Elteren
  • , Maaike M. Flinkenflögel
  • , Jamilah Sherally
  • , Helma W. C. Hofland
  • , Nancy E. E. van Loey
  • , Eduard E. Zijlstra*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
  • Royal Tropical Institute
  • Rotterdam Centre for Tropical Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

763 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: The Dutch Medical Doctor-Global Health (MD-GH) prepares to work in low-resource settings (LRS) by completing a hybrid postgraduate training program of 2 years and 9 months, with clinical and public health exposure in the Netherlands and a Global Health residency in LRS. The objectives of the program include acquiring clinical skills to work as a physician in a setting with different (often more severe) pathology and limited resources. In public health teaching, emphasis is given, among other, to adapting to a culturally different environment. After graduation, MD-GH work in a wide variety of countries and settings for variable time. As part of a curriculum review, this study examines MD-GHs' perception of the quality of the training program and provides recommendations for improvement. Methods: A qualitative study was performed. Thematic analysis was applied to semi-structured interviews with 23 MD-GH who graduated between 2017 and 2021. Results: MD-GHs predominantly worked as clinicians; several were (also) involved in management or capacity building. The clinical training program adequately addressed general skills, but did not sufficiently prepare for locally encountered, often severe, pathology. During the training, adequate supervision with clear learning goals was found pivotal to a positive learning experience. Gaps included clinical training in Internal Medicine (particularly infectious diseases and non-communicable diseases) and Paediatrics. Public Health teaching as well as cultural awareness should be intensified and introduced earlier in the program. The Global Health residency was considered important, but tasks and learning outcomes varied. Teaching, supervision, and capacity building were considered increasingly important key elements of working in LRS. Consensus favoured the current duration of the training program without extension. Discussion: While the generalist nature of the MD-GH training was appreciated, the program would benefit from additional clinical training in infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, and Paediatrics. Moving forward, emphasis should be placed on structured mentorship, enhanced public health teaching, and standardized residency programs with clearly delineated objectives to better equip MD-GH professionals for their multifaceted roles in LRS. Moreover, future revisions of the training program should incorporate the perspectives of host institutes in LRS and tailor the training needs.
Original languageEnglish
Article number663
JournalBMC medical education
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Dutch
  • Global health
  • Graduates' perspectives
  • Post-graduate training
  • Tropical medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dutch post-graduate training in Global Health and Tropical Medicine: a qualitative study on graduates’ perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this