Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial

  • L. A. Magee
  • , P. von Dadelszen
  • , J. Singer
  • , T. Lee
  • , E. Rey
  • , S. Ross
  • , E. Asztalos
  • , K. E. Murphy
  • , J. Menzies
  • , J. Sanchez
  • , A. Gafni
  • , A. Gruslin
  • , M. Helewa
  • , E. Hutton
  • , G. Koren
  • , S. K. Lee
  • , A. G. Logan
  • , J. W. Ganzevoort
  • , R. Welch
  • , J. G. Thornton
  • J.-M. Moutquin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective To compare pregnancy outcomes, accounting for allocated group, between methyldopa-treated and labetalol-treated women in the CHIPS Trial (ISRCTN 71416914) of 'less tight' versus 'tight' control of pregnancy hypertension. Design Secondary analysis of CHIPS Trial cohort. Setting International randomised controlled trial (94 sites, 15 countries). Population or sample Of 987 CHIPS recruits, 481/566 (85.0%) women treated with antihypertensive therapy at randomisation. Of 981 (99.4%) women followed to delivery, 656/745 (88.1%) treated postrandomisation. Methods Logistic regression to compare outcomes among women who took methyldopa or labetalol, adjusted for the influence of baseline factors. Main outcome measures CHIPS primary (perinatal loss or high level neonatal care for >48 hours) and secondary (serious maternal complications) outcomes, birthweight <10th centile, severe maternal hypertension, pre-eclampsia and delivery at <34 or <37 weeks. Results Methyldopa and labetalol were used commonly at randomisation (243/987, 24.6% and 238/987, 24.6%, respectively) and post-randomisation (224/981, 22.8% and 433/981, 44.1%, respectively). Following adjusted analyses, methyldopa (versus labetalol) at randomisation was associated with fewer babies with birthweight <10th centile [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48; 95% CI 0.20-0.87]. Methyldopa (versus labetalol) postrandomisation was associated with fewer CHIPS primary outcomes (aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.40-1.00), birthweight <10th centile (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.320.92), severe hypertension (aOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.83), preeclampsia (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.85), and delivery at <34 weeks (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.96) or <37 weeks (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85). Conclusion These nonrandomised comparisons are subject to residual confounding, but women treated with methyldopa (versus labetalol), particularly those with pre-existing hypertension, may have had better outcomes
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1143-1151
JournalBJOG
Volume123
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this