Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disagreement of diameter and volume measurements for pulmonary nodule size estimation in CT lung cancer screening

  • Marjolein A. Heuvelmans*
  • , Joan E. Walter
  • , Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
  • , Peter M. A. van Ooijen
  • , Geertruida H. de Bock
  • , Harry J. de Koning
  • , Matthijs Oudkerk
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Groningen
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We studied 2240 indeterminate solid nodules (volume 50-500mm 3) to determine the correlation of diameter and semi-automated volume measurements for pulmonary nodule size estimation. Intra-nodular diameter variation, defined as maximum minus minimum diameter through the nodule's center, varied by 2.8 mm (median, IQR:2.2-3.7 mm), so above the 1.5 mm cutoff for nodule growth used in Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). Using mean or maximum axial diameter to assess nodule volume led to a substantial mean overestimation of nodule volume of 47.2% and 85.1%, respectively, compared to semi-automated volume. Thus, size of indeterminate nodules is poorly represented by diameter. Trial registration number Pre-results, ISRCTN63545820.
Original languageEnglish
Article number210770
JournalThorax
Volume73
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disagreement of diameter and volume measurements for pulmonary nodule size estimation in CT lung cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this