Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Phenotyping Using Pretreatment Uracil: A Note of Caution Based on a Large Prospective Clinical Study

  • Mirjam de With*
  • , Jonathan Knikman
  • , Femke M. de Man
  • , Carin A. T. C. Lunenburg
  • , Linda M. Henricks
  • , André B. P. van Kuilenburg
  • , Jan G. Maring
  • , Maurice C. van Staveren
  • , Niels de Vries
  • , Hilde Rosing
  • , Jos H. Beijnen
  • , Dick Pluim
  • , Anil Modak
  • , Alex L. T. Imholz
  • , Ron H. N. van Schaik
  • , Jan H. M. Schellens
  • , Hans Gelderblom
  • , Annemieke Cats
  • , Henk-Jan Guchelaar
  • , Ron H. J. Mathijssen
  • Jesse J. Swen, Didier Meulendijks
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Erasmus MC
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Isala Clinics
  • Diaconessen Hospital
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, the Netherlands
  • Utrecht University
  • Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc
  • Owlstone Medical
  • Deventer Ziekenhuis
  • AstraZeneca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In clinical practice, 25–30% of the patients treated with fluoropyrimidines experience severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Extensively clinically validated DPYD genotyping tests are available to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity due to decreased activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate limiting enzyme in fluoropyrimidine metabolism. In April 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended that, as an alternative for DPYD genotype-based testing for DPD deficiency, also phenotype testing based on pretreatment plasma uracil levels is a suitable method to identify patients with DPD deficiency. Although the evidence for genotype-directed dosing of fluoropyrimidines is substantial, the level of evidence supporting plasma uracil levels to predict DPD activity in clinical practice is limited. Notwithstanding this, uracil-based phenotyping is now used in clinical practice in various countries in Europe. We aimed to determine the value of pretreatment uracil levels in predicting DPD deficiency and severe treatment-related toxicity. To this end, we determined pretreatment uracil levels in 955 patients with cancer, and assessed the correlation with DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity. We identified substantial issues concerning the use of pretreatment uracil in clinical practice, including large between-center study differences in measured pretreatment uracil levels, most likely as a result of pre-analytical factors. Importantly, we were not able to correlate pretreatment uracil levels with DPD activity nor were uracil levels predictive of severe treatment-related toxicity. We urge that robust clinical validation should first be performed before pretreatment plasma uracil levels are used in clinical practice as part of a dosing strategy for fluoropyrimidines.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-68
Number of pages7
JournalClinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Volume112
Issue number1
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Phenotyping Using Pretreatment Uracil: A Note of Caution Based on a Large Prospective Clinical Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this