Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Differences and similarities between the EULAR/ASAS-EULAR and national recommendations for treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe

  • Brigitte Michelsen*
  • , Mikkel Østergaard
  • , Michael John Nissen
  • , Adrian Ciurea
  • , Burkhard Möller
  • , Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
  • , Jakub Zavada
  • , Bente Glintborg
  • , Alan MacDonald
  • , Karin Laas
  • , Dan Nordström
  • , Bjorn Gudbjornsson
  • , Florenzo Iannone
  • , Pasoon Hellmand
  • , Tore Kristian Kvien
  • , Ana Maria Rodrigues
  • , Catalin Codreanu
  • , Ziga Rotar
  • , Isabel Castrejón Fernández
  • , Johan Karlsson Wallman
  • Jiri Vencovsky, Anne Gitte Loft, Maureen Heddle, Sigrid Vorobjov, Anna-Mari Hokkanen, Gerdur Gröndal, Marco Sebastiani, Marleen van de Sande, Eirik Klami Kristianslund, Maria José Santos, Corina Mogosan, Matija Tomsic, Federico Díaz-González, Daniela di Giuseppe, Merete Lund Hetland
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Department of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
  • University of Geneva
  • University Hospital Zürich
  • University of Bern
  • Institute of rheumatology
  • Charles University
  • NHS Grampian
  • East-Tallinn Central Hospital
  • Helsinki University Hospital
  • Landspitali University Hospital
  • University of Iceland
  • University of Bari
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia
  • NOVA University Lisbon
  • Hospital dos Lusíadas
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • University of Ljubljana
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
  • Complutense University
  • Lund University
  • Aarhus University
  • University of Aberdeen
  • National Institute for Health Development
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Immunology Center (ARC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Hospital Garcia de Orta
  • University of Lisbon
  • University of La Laguna
  • Hospital Universitario de Canarias
  • Karolinska Institutet

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is the first report comparing EULAR and national treatment recommendations for PsA patients across Europe, and the first this decade to compare ASAS-EULAR and national treatment recommendations in axSpA patients. An electronic survey was completed from October 2021–April 2022 by rheumatologists in 15 European countries. One and four countries followed all EULAR and ASAS-EULAR recommendations, respectively. Five countries had no national treatment recommendations for PsA and/or axSpA, but followed other regulations. In several countries, national treatment recommendations predated the most recent EULAR/ASAS-EULAR recommendations. Entry criteria for starting biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs varied considerably. In several countries, for PsA patients with significant skin involvement, interleukin-17 inhibitors were not given preference. The positioning of Janus Kinase inhibitors differed and Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors were not in use/reimbursed in most countries. This study may motivate European countries to update their national treatment recommendations, to align them better with the latest international recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100706
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Axial spondyloarthritis
  • Health policy
  • Psoriatic arthritis
  • Treatment recommendations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences and similarities between the EULAR/ASAS-EULAR and national recommendations for treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this