Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

  • Alan J. Thompson
  • , Brenda L. Banwell
  • , Frederik Barkhof
  • , William M. Carroll
  • , Timothy Coetzee
  • , Giancarlo Comi
  • , Jorge Correale
  • , Franz Fazekas
  • , Massimo Filippi
  • , Mark S. Freedman
  • , Kazuo Fujihara
  • , Steven L. Galetta
  • , Hans Peter Hartung
  • , Ludwig Kappos
  • , Fred D. Lublin
  • , Ruth Ann Marrie
  • , Aaron E. Miller
  • , David H. Miller
  • , Xavier Montalban
  • , Ellen M. Mowry
  • Per Soelberg Sorensen, Mar Tintoré, Anthony L. Traboulsee, Maria Trojano, Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag, Sandra Vukusic, Emmanuelle Waubant, Brian G. Weinshenker, Stephen C. Reingold, Jeffrey A. Cohen*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University College London
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
  • National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia
  • Medical University of Graz
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • Fukushima Medical University
  • Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience
  • New York University
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • University of Basel
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • University of Manitoba
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • University of Toronto
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Bari
  • Hôpital neurologique et neurochirurgical Pierre Wertheimer
  • Lyon Neurosciences Research Center
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Scientific and Clinical Review Associates LLC
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The 2010 McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis are widely used in research and clinical practice. Scientific advances in the past 7 years suggest that they might no longer provide the most up-to-date guidance for clinicians and researchers. The International Panel on Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis reviewed the 2010 McDonald criteria and recommended revisions. The 2017 McDonald criteria continue to apply primarily to patients experiencing a typical clinically isolated syndrome, define what is needed to fulfil dissemination in time and space of lesions in the CNS, and stress the need for no better explanation for the presentation. The following changes were made: in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and clinical or MRI demonstration of dissemination in space, the presence of CSF-specific oligoclonal bands allows a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis; symptomatic lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space or time in patients with supratentorial, infratentorial, or spinal cord syndrome; and cortical lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space. Research to further refine the criteria should focus on optic nerve involvement, validation in diverse populations, and incorporation of advanced imaging, neurophysiological, and body fluid markers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-173
Number of pages12
JournalThe Lancet Neurology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this