Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diagnosing Polyparasitism in a High-Prevalence Setting in Beira, Mozambique: Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Fecal Samples by Microscopy and Real-Time PCR

  • Lynn Meurs
  • , Anton M. Polderman
  • , Natalie V.S. Vinkeles Melchers
  • , Eric A.T. Brienen
  • , Jaco J. Verweij
  • , Bernhard Groosjohan
  • , Felisberto Mendes
  • , Manito Mechendura
  • , Dagmar H. Hepp
  • , Marijke C.C. Langenberg
  • , Rosanne Edelenbosch
  • , Katja Polman
  • , Lisette van Lieshout*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University Medical Center - LUMC
  • Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
  • Erasmus MC University Medical Center
  • ETZ Elisabeth
  • Catholic University of Mozambique
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Many different intestinal parasite species can co-occur in the same population. However, classic diagnostic tools can only frame a particular group of intestinal parasite species. Hence, one or two tests do not suffice to provide a complete picture of infecting parasite species in a given population. The present study investigated intestinal parasitic infections in Beira, Mozambique, i.e. in the informal settlement of Inhamudima. Diagnostic accuracy of five classical microscopy techniques and real-time PCR for the detection of a broad spectrum of parasites was compared. Methodology/Principal Findings: A cross-sectional population-based survey was performed. One stool sample per participant (n = 303) was examined by direct smear, formal-ether concentration (FEC), Kato smear, Baermann method, coproculture and real-time PCR. We found that virtually all people (96%) harbored at least one helminth, and that almost half (49%) harbored three helminths or more. Remarkably, Strongyloides stercoralis infections were widespread with a prevalence of 48%, and Ancylostoma spp. prevalence was higher than that of Necator americanus (25% versus 15%), the hookworm species that is often assumed to prevail in East-Africa. Among the microscopic techniques, FEC was able to detect the broadest spectrum of parasite species. However, FEC also missed a considerable number of infections, notably S. stercoralis, Schistosoma mansoni and G. intestinalis. PCR outperformed microscopy in terms of sensitivity and range of parasite species detected. Conclusions/Significance: We showed intestinal parasites—especially helminths—to be omnipresent in Inhamudima, Beira. However, it is a challenge to achieve high diagnostic sensitivity for all species. Classical techniques such as FEC are useful for the detection of some intestinal helminth species, but they lack sensitivity for other parasite species. PCR can detect intestinal parasites more accurately but is generally not feasible in resource-poor settings, at least not in peripheral labs. Hence, there is a need for a more field-friendly, sensitive approach for on-the-spot diagnosis of parasitic infections.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0005310
JournalPLoS neglected tropical diseases
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jan 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnosing Polyparasitism in a High-Prevalence Setting in Beira, Mozambique: Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Fecal Samples by Microscopy and Real-Time PCR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this