Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of the EURO-D scale - A European Union initiative to compare symptoms of depression in 14 European centres

  • M. J. Prince*
  • , F. Reischies
  • , A. T.F. Beekman
  • , R. Fuhrer
  • , C. Jonker
  • , S. L. Kivela
  • , B. A. Lawlor
  • , A. Lobo
  • , H. Magnusson
  • , M. Fichter
  • , H. Van Oyen
  • , M. Roelands
  • , I. Skoog
  • , C. Turrina
  • , J. R.M. Copeland
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Free University of Berlin
  • Sorbonne Université
  • University of Oulu
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • University of Zaragoza
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels
  • Ghent University
  • Psykiatriska Kliniken
  • Clinica Psichiatrica
  • University of Liverpool

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background. In all 11-country European collaboration, 14 population- based surveys included 21 724 subjects aged ≥ 65 years. Most participating centres used the Geriatric Mental State (GMS), but other measures were also used. Aims. To derive from these instruments a common depression symptoms scale, the EURO-D, to allow comparison of risk factor profiles between centres. Method. Common items were identified from the instruments. Algorithms for fitting items to GMS were derived by observation of item correspondence or expert opinion. The resulting 12-item scale was checked for internal consistency, criterion validity and uniformity or factor-analytic profile. Results. The EURO-D is internally consistent, capturing the essence of its parent instrument. A two-factor solution seemed appropriate: depression, tearfulness and wishing to die loaded on the first factor (affective suffering), and loss of interest, poor concentration and lack of enjoyment on the second (motivation). Conclusions. The EURO-D scale should permit valid comparison of risk-factor associations between centres, even if between-centre variation remains difficult to attribute.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-338
Number of pages9
JournalBritish journal of psychiatry
Volume174
Issue numberAPR.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of the EURO-D scale - A European Union initiative to compare symptoms of depression in 14 European centres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this