Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development and validation of prediction models for prehospital triage of military trauma patients

  • Robin D. Lokerman*
  • , R. van der Sluijs
  • , J. F. Waalwijk
  • , E. J. M. M. Verleisdonk
  • , R. A. Haasdijk
  • , M. M. van Deemter
  • , L. P. H. Leenen
  • , M. van Heijl
  • , Koen W. W. Lansink
  • , Mariska A. C. de Jongh
  • , Dennisden Hartog
  • , Jens A. Halm
  • , Georgios F. Giannakópoulos
  • , Michael J. R. Edwards
  • , Martijn Poeze
  • , Pierre M. van Grunsven
  • , Nancy W. P. L. van der Waarden
  • , Merel Willeboer
  • , Arjen Siegers
  • , Risco van Vliet
  • Prehospital Trauma Triage Research Collaborative (PTTRC)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Utrecht University
  • Stanford Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Imaging
  • Maastricht University
  • Diakonessenhuis Utrecht
  • Defence Health Care Education and Training Centre
  • Meander Medical Center
  • Hand Centre Utrecht
  • ETZ Tilburg
  • Netwerk Acute Zorg Brabant
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Veiligheidsregio Gelderland-Zuid
  • AmbulanceZorg Rotterdam-Rijnmond
  • Regionale Ambulance Voorziening Zuid-Holland Zuid
  • Regionale Ambulance Voorziening Zaanstreek-Waterland
  • Regionale Ambulance Voorziening Brabant Midden-West-Noord
  • Regionale Ambulance Voorziening Utrecht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of wireless sensors will enable military care providers to continuously and remotely assess/monitor vital signs. Prediction models are needed to use such data adequately and aid military care providers in their on-scene decision-making to optimise prehospital triage and improve patient outcomes. Methods: A prospective cohort comprising data from eight Emergency Medical Services and seven inclusive trauma regions was used to develop and validate prediction models that could aid military care providers in their prehospital triage decisions. Healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification 1 or 2) admitted adult trauma patients (aged ≥16 and ≤50 years), who suffered from a trauma mechanism that could occur to military personnel and were transported by ambulance from the scene of injury to a hospital, were included. A full model strategy was used, including prehospital predictors that are expected to be automaticly collectible by wireless sensors or to be incorporated in a personalised device that could run the models. Models were developed to predict early critical-resource use (ECRU), severe head injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥4), serious thoracic injury (AIS ≥3) and severe internal bleeding (>20% blood loss). Model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration. Results: Prediction models were developed with data from 4625 patients (80.0%) and validated with data from 1157 patients (20.0%). The models had good to excellent discriminative performance for the predicted outcomes in the validation cohort, with an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.84) for ECRU, 0.83 (0.76 to 0.91) for severe head injury, 0.75 (0.70 to 0.80) for serious thoracic injury and 0.85 (0.78 to 0.93) for severe internal bleeding. All models showed satisfactory calibration in the validation cohort. Conclusion: The developed models could reliably predict outcomes in a simulated military trauma population and potentially support prehospital care providers in their triage decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbermilitary-2023-002644
JournalBMJ military health
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and validation of prediction models for prehospital triage of military trauma patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this