TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict cognitive behavioral therapy outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder using clinical and neuroimaging data
AU - van de Mortel, Laurens A.
AU - Bruin, Willem B.
AU - Alonso, Pino
AU - Bertolín, Sara
AU - Feusner, Jamie D.
AU - Guo, Joyce
AU - Hagen, Kristen
AU - Hansen, Bjarne
AU - Thorsen, Anders Lillevik
AU - Martínez-Zalacaín, Ignacio
AU - Menchón, Jose M.
AU - Nurmi, Erika L.
AU - O'Neill, Joseph
AU - Piacentini, John C.
AU - Real, Eva
AU - Segalàs, Cinto
AU - Soriano-Mas, Carles
AU - Thomopoulos, Sophia I.
AU - Stein, Dan J.
AU - Thompson, Paul M.
AU - van den Heuvel, Odile A.
AU - van Wingen, Guido A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/11/15
Y1 - 2025/11/15
N2 - Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a first-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but clinical response is difficult to predict. In this study, we aimed to develop predictive models using clinical and neuroimaging data from the multicenter Enhancing Neuro-Imaging and Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA)-OCD consortium. Methods: Baseline clinical and resting-state functional magnetic imaging (rs-fMRI) data from 159 adult patients aged 18–60 years (88 female) with OCD who received CBT at four treatment/neuroimaging sites were included. Fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations, regional homogeneity and atlas-based functional connectivity were computed. Clinical CBT response and remission were predicted using support vector machine and random forest classifiers on clinical data only, rs-fMRI data only, and the combination of both clinical and rs-fMRI data. Results: The use of only clinical data yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.69 for predicting remission (p = 0.001). Lower baseline symptom severity, younger age, an absence of cleaning obsessions, unmedicated status, and higher education had the highest model impact in predicting remission. The best predictive performance using only rs-fMRI was obtained with regional homogeneity for remission (AUC = 0.59). Predicting response with rs-fMRI generally did not exceed chance level. Conclusions: Machine learning models based on clinical data may thus hold promise in predicting remission after CBT for OCD, but the predictive power of multicenter rs-fMRI data is limited.
AB - Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a first-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but clinical response is difficult to predict. In this study, we aimed to develop predictive models using clinical and neuroimaging data from the multicenter Enhancing Neuro-Imaging and Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA)-OCD consortium. Methods: Baseline clinical and resting-state functional magnetic imaging (rs-fMRI) data from 159 adult patients aged 18–60 years (88 female) with OCD who received CBT at four treatment/neuroimaging sites were included. Fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuations, regional homogeneity and atlas-based functional connectivity were computed. Clinical CBT response and remission were predicted using support vector machine and random forest classifiers on clinical data only, rs-fMRI data only, and the combination of both clinical and rs-fMRI data. Results: The use of only clinical data yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.69 for predicting remission (p = 0.001). Lower baseline symptom severity, younger age, an absence of cleaning obsessions, unmedicated status, and higher education had the highest model impact in predicting remission. The best predictive performance using only rs-fMRI was obtained with regional homogeneity for remission (AUC = 0.59). Predicting response with rs-fMRI generally did not exceed chance level. Conclusions: Machine learning models based on clinical data may thus hold promise in predicting remission after CBT for OCD, but the predictive power of multicenter rs-fMRI data is limited.
KW - CBT
KW - Clinical
KW - Machine learning
KW - Neuroimaging
KW - OCD
KW - Prediction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008564485
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119729
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119729
M3 - Article
C2 - 40541838
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 389
JO - Journal of affective disorders
JF - Journal of affective disorders
M1 - 119729
ER -