Abstract
The authors discuss the definitions of environmental monitoring (EM), biological monitoring (BM) and health surveillance (HS) as agreed upon by a CEC/NIOSH/OSHA-seminar in 1980. They emphasize the essential differences in underlying principles. They add a fourth definition of biological effect monitoring (BEM). Each method has its own assets and liabilities. Moreover, EM and BM require another decision-making process (situation-centered) then BEM and HS (client-entered) of measures to be taken. When the differences between the four approaches are not taken into account, valid preventive measures may be hampered. © 1986 Springer-Verlag.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 249-257 |
| Journal | International archives of occupational and environmental health |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 1986 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Definitions of monitoring activities and their relevance for the practice of occupational health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver