Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs

  • Thomas Minten
  • , Sarah Bick
  • , Sophia Adelson
  • , Nils Gehlenborg
  • , Laura M. Amendola
  • , François Boemer
  • , Alison J. Coffey
  • , Nicolas Encina
  • , Alessandra Ferlini
  • , Janbernd Kirschner
  • , Bianca E. Russell
  • , Laurent Servais
  • , Kristen L. Sund
  • , Ryan J. Taft
  • , Petros Tsipouras
  • , Hana Zouk
  • , ICoNS Gene List Contributors
  • , International Consortium on Newborn Sequencing (ICoNS)
  • KU Leuven
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Harvard University
  • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
  • Stanford University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Liege
  • Illumina, Inc.
  • ICoNS
  • Ariadne Labs
  • University of Ferrara
  • University of Freiburg
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Oxford
  • Nurture Genomics
  • FirstSteps-BNSI
  • Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
  • Genomics England
  • Mass General Brigham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Over 30 international studies are exploring newborn sequencing (NBSeq) to expand the range of genetic disorders included in newborn screening. Substantial variability in gene selection across programs exists, highlighting the need for a systematic approach to prioritize genes. Methods: We assembled a data set comprising 25 characteristics about each of the 4390 genes included in 27 NBSeq programs. We used regression analysis to identify several predictors of inclusion and developed a machine learning model to rank genes for public health consideration. Results: Among 27 NBSeq programs, the number of genes analyzed ranged from 134 to 4299, with only 74 (1.7%) genes included by over 80% of programs. The most significant associations with gene inclusion across programs were presence on the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (inclusion increase of 74.7%, CI: 71.0%-78.4%), robust evidence on the natural history (29.5%, CI: 24.6%-34.4%), and treatment efficacy (17.0%, CI: 12.3%-21.7%) of the associated genetic disease. A boosted trees machine learning model using 13 predictors achieved high accuracy in predicting gene inclusion across programs (area under the curve = 0.915, R2 = 84%). Conclusion: The machine learning model developed here provides a ranked list of genes that can adapt to emerging evidence and regional needs, enabling more consistent and informed gene selection in NBSeq initiatives.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101443
JournalGenetics in medicine
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Gene selection
  • Gene-disorder associations
  • Genomic sequencing
  • Machine learning
  • Newborn screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this