TY - JOUR
T1 - Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism
AU - Schulman, Sam
AU - Kearon, Clive
AU - Kakkar, Ajay K.
AU - Mismetti, Patrick
AU - Schellong, Sebastian
AU - Eriksson, Henry
AU - Baanstra, David
AU - Schnee, Janet
AU - Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
AU - AUTHOR GROUP
AU - Schulman, S.
AU - Eriksson, H.
AU - Goldhaber, S.
AU - Kakkar, A.
AU - Kearon, C.
AU - Mismetti, P.
AU - Schellong, S.
AU - Minar, E.
AU - Bergqvist, D.
AU - Tijssen, J.
AU - Prins, M. [=Martin H.]
AU - Büller, H.
AU - Otten, J.
AU - Peters, R.
AU - Mac Gillavry, M.
AU - Pol, S.
AU - Burroughs, A.
AU - Gilmore, I.
AU - Bluguermann, J.
AU - Carlevaro, O.
AU - Dipaola, L.
AU - Gitelman, P.
AU - Santos, D.
AU - Schygiel, P.
AU - Baker, R.
AU - Blombery, P.
AU - Gallus, A.
AU - Gan, E.
AU - Gibbs, H.
AU - Salem, H.
AU - Baghestanian, M.
AU - Pilger, E.
AU - Sturm, W.
AU - Debing, E.
AU - Gadisseur, A.
AU - Hainaut, P.
AU - Verhamme, P.
AU - Wautrecht, J.-C.
AU - Zicot, M.
AU - Bizzachi, J. M. Annichino
AU - Araujo, G.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - BACKGROUND: The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests. RESULTS: A total of 30 of the 1274 patients randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2.4%), as compared with 27 of the 1265 patients randomly assigned to warfarin (2.1%), had recurrent venous thromboembolism; the difference in risk was 0.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 1.5; P <0.001 for the prespecified noninferiority margin). The hazard ratio with dabigatran was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.84). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 20 patients assigned to dabigatran (1.6%) and in 24 patients assigned to warfarin (1.9%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.48), and episodes of any bleeding were observed in 205 patients assigned to dabigatran (16.1%) and 277 patients assigned to warfarin (21.9%; hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85). The numbers of deaths, acute coronary syndromes, and abnormal liver-function tests were similar in the two groups. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 9.0% of patients assigned to dabigatran and in 6.8% of patients assigned to warfarin (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, a fixed dose of dabigatran is as effective as warfarin, has a safety profile that is similar to that of warfarin, and does not require laboratory monitoring. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00291330.)
AB - BACKGROUND: The direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran has a predictable anticoagulant effect and may be an alternative therapy to warfarin for patients who have acute venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving patients with acute venous thromboembolism who were initially given parenteral anticoagulation therapy for a median of 9 days (interquartile range, 8 to 11), we compared oral dabigatran, administered at a dose of 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin that was dose-adjusted to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. The primary outcome was the 6-month incidence of recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and related deaths. Safety end points included bleeding events, acute coronary syndromes, other adverse events, and results of liver-function tests. RESULTS: A total of 30 of the 1274 patients randomly assigned to receive dabigatran (2.4%), as compared with 27 of the 1265 patients randomly assigned to warfarin (2.1%), had recurrent venous thromboembolism; the difference in risk was 0.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 1.5; P <0.001 for the prespecified noninferiority margin). The hazard ratio with dabigatran was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.84). Major bleeding episodes occurred in 20 patients assigned to dabigatran (1.6%) and in 24 patients assigned to warfarin (1.9%) (hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.48), and episodes of any bleeding were observed in 205 patients assigned to dabigatran (16.1%) and 277 patients assigned to warfarin (21.9%; hazard ratio with dabigatran, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85). The numbers of deaths, acute coronary syndromes, and abnormal liver-function tests were similar in the two groups. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 9.0% of patients assigned to dabigatran and in 6.8% of patients assigned to warfarin (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, a fixed dose of dabigatran is as effective as warfarin, has a safety profile that is similar to that of warfarin, and does not require laboratory monitoring. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00291330.)
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598
M3 - Article
C2 - 19966341
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 361
SP - 2342
EP - 2352
JO - New England journal of medicine
JF - New England journal of medicine
IS - 24
ER -