Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current state of Alzheimer’s fluid biomarkers

  • José Luis Molinuevo
  • , Scott Ayton
  • , Richard Batrla
  • , Martin M. Bednar
  • , Tobias Bittner
  • , Jeffrey Cummings
  • , Anne M. Fagan
  • , Harald Hampel
  • , Michelle M. Mielke
  • , Alvydas Mikulskis
  • , Sid O’Bryant
  • , Philip Scheltens
  • , Jeffrey Sevigny
  • , Leslie M. Shaw
  • , Holly D. Soares
  • , Gary Tong
  • , John Q. Trojanowski
  • , Henrik Zetterberg
  • , Kaj Blennow
  • Pompeu Fabra University
  • August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute
  • University of Melbourne
  • Roche Centralised and Point of Care Solutions, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
  • Neuroscience Therapeutic Area Unit, Cambridge, United States
  • Genentech Incorporated
  • Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, United States
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • AXA
  • Assistance publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
  • CNRS
  • Département de Génétique et Cytogénétique
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Biogen IDEC
  • University of North Texas
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • AbbVie
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Sahlgrenska Academy
  • University of Gothenburg
  • UCL Institute of Neurology
  • Great Ormond St Hospital for Children NHS Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with a complex and heterogeneous pathophysiology. The number of people living with AD is predicted to increase; however, there are no disease-modifying therapies currently available and none have been successful in late-stage clinical trials. Fluid biomarkers measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood hold promise for enabling more effective drug development and establishing a more personalized medicine approach for AD diagnosis and treatment. Biomarkers used in drug development programmes should be qualified for a specific context of use (COU). These COUs include, but are not limited to, subject/patient selection, assessment of disease state and/or prognosis, assessment of mechanism of action, dose optimization, drug response monitoring, efficacy maximization, and toxicity/adverse reactions identification and minimization. The core AD CSF biomarkers Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau are recognized by research guidelines for their diagnostic utility and are being considered for qualification for subject selection in clinical trials. However, there is a need to better understand their potential for other COUs, as well as identify additional fluid biomarkers reflecting other aspects of AD pathophysiology. Several novel fluid biomarkers have been proposed, but their role in AD pathology and their use as AD biomarkers have yet to be validated. In this review, we summarize some of the pathological mechanisms implicated in the sporadic AD and highlight the data for several established and novel fluid biomarkers (including BACE1, TREM2, YKL-40, IP-10, neurogranin, SNAP-25, synaptotagmin, α-synuclein, TDP-43, ferritin, VILIP-1, and NF-L) associated with each mechanism. We discuss the potential COUs for each biomarker.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)821-853
JournalActa neuropathologica
Volume136
Issue number6
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current state of Alzheimer’s fluid biomarkers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this