Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current controversies and challenges in allergic rhinitis management

  • David Price
  • , Pete Smith
  • , Peter Hellings
  • , Nikos Papadopoulos
  • , Wytske Fokkens
  • , Antonella Muraro
  • , Ruth Murray
  • , Alison Chisholm
  • , Pascal Demoly
  • , Glenis Scadding
  • , Joaquim Mullol
  • , Phil Lieberman
  • , Claus Bachert
  • , Ralph Mösges
  • , Dermot Ryan
  • , Jean Bousquet

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There are many obstacles in the path of effective allergy management, in general, and allergic rhinitis (AR) control, in particular. Chief among them are: insufficient symptom relief in some patients provided by some currently considered first-line AR treatments in real life; an over-reliance on randomized controlled trials to direct AR guideline recommendations; the need for a broader interpretation of the AR evidence base (to include randomized controlled trials and real-life studies); poorly designed and interpreted studies; and lack of an AR control concept and common language of control. These controversies are fully reviewed here and challenging solutions have been presented
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1205-1217
JournalExpert review of clinical immunology
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current controversies and challenges in allergic rhinitis management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this