Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross-Sectional Study on MRI Restaging After Chemoradiotherapy and Interval to Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Influence on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

  • Robin Detering
  • , Wernard A. A. Borstlap
  • , Lisa Broeders
  • , Linda Hermus
  • , Corrie A. M. Marijnen
  • , Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
  • , Willem A. Bemelman
  • , Henderik L. van Westreenen
  • , Pieter J. Tanis
  • , Dutch Snapshot Research Group
  • Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Scientific Bureau of the Dutch Institute of Clinical Auditing, Leiden, Netherlands
  • Department of Surgery, Groningen, Netherlands
  • Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden, Netherlands
  • Department of Radiology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Department of Surgery, Zwolle, Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The time interval between CRT and surgery in rectal cancer patients is still the subject of debate. The aim of this study was to first evaluate the nationwide use of restaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its impact on timing of surgery, and, second, to evaluate the impact of timing of surgery after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients were selected from a collaborative rectal cancer research project including 71 Dutch centres, and were subdivided into two groups according to time interval from the start of preoperative CRT to surgery (< 14 and ≥ 14 weeks). Results: From 2095 registered patients, 475 patients received preoperative CRT. MRI restaging was performed in 79.4% of patients, with a median CRT–MRI interval of 10 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 8–11) and a median MRI–surgery interval of 4 weeks (IQR 2–5). The CRT–surgery interval groups consisted of 224 (< 14 weeks) and 251 patients (≥ 14 weeks), and the long-interval group included a higher proportion of cT4 stage and multivisceral resection patients. Pathological complete response rate (n = 34 [15.2%] vs. n = 47 [18.7%], p = 0.305) and CRM involvement (9.7% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.145) did not significantly differ. Thirty-day surgical complications were similar (20.1% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.943), however no significant differences were found for local and distant recurrence rates, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Conclusions: These real-life data, reflecting routine daily practice in The Netherlands, showed substantial variability in the use and timing of restaging MRI after preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, as well as time interval to surgery. Surgery before or after 14 weeks from the start of CRT resulted in similar short- and long-term outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-448
JournalAnnals of surgical oncology
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-Sectional Study on MRI Restaging After Chemoradiotherapy and Interval to Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Influence on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this