Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Critically Appraised Topics in the British Journal of Dermatology: response from Jonathan Batchelor and Phyllis Spuls, section editors for BJD's 'Putting Papers into Practice'

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

Abstract

We were very pleased to see the correspondence from Dr Mike Sladden regarding the Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) that we published in the BJD recently(1) . We agree that it is a very helpful CAT, addressing a question that is commonly encountered in dermatological practice. The inclusion of the patient's perspective is a good way of keeping the CAT grounded in the principles of shared decision making (although it is not a mandatory part of a CAT as such). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)910-911
JournalBritish journal of dermatology
Volume171
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critically Appraised Topics in the British Journal of Dermatology: response from Jonathan Batchelor and Phyllis Spuls, section editors for BJD's 'Putting Papers into Practice''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this