Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Criteria for second generation comparator tests in validation of novel HPV DNA tests for use in cervical cancer screening

  • Marc Arbyn*
  • , Kate Cuschieri
  • , Jesper Bonde
  • , Rob Schuurman
  • , Clementina Cocuzza
  • , Davy Vanden Broeck
  • , Fang-Hui Zhao
  • , Remila Rezhake
  • , Murat Gultekin
  • , Silvia de Sanjosé
  • , Karen Canfell
  • , David Hawkes
  • , Marion Saville
  • , Peter Hillemanns
  • , Joakim Dillner
  • , Johannes Berkhof
  • , Jean-Luc Prétet
  • , Tarik Gheit
  • , Gary Clifford
  • , Partha Basu
  • Maribel Almonte, Nicolas Wentzensen, Mario Poljak
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Belgian Cancer Centre
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Utrecht University
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Xinjiang Medical University
  • Hacettepe University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Instituto de Salud Global de Barcelona
  • The University of Sydney
  • Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer
  • Hannover Medical School
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Université de Franche-Comté
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Ljubljana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While HC2 and GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA were pivotal in test validation of new HPV assays, they represent the first generation of comparator tests based upon technologies that are not in widespread use anymore. In the current guideline, criteria for second-generation comparator tests are presented that include more detailed resolution of HPV genotypes. Second-generation comparator tests should preferentially target only the 12 genotypes classified as carcinogenic (IARC-group I), and show consistent non-inferior sensitivity for CIN2+ and CIN3+ and specificity for ≤CIN1 compared to one of the first-generations comparators, in at least three validation studies using benchmarks of 0.95 for relative sensitivity and 0.98 for relative specificity. Validation should take into account used storage media and other sample handling procedures. Meta-analyses were conducted to identify the assays that fulfill these stringent criteria. Four tests fulfilled the new criteria: (1) RealTime High-Risk HPV Test (Abbott), (2) Cobas-4800 HPV test (Roche Molecular System), (3) Onclarity HPV Assay (BD Diagnostics), and (4) Anyplex II HPV HR Detection (Seegene), each evaluated in three to six studies. Whereas the four assays target 14 carcinogenic genotypes, the first two identify separately HPV16 and 18, the third assay identifies five types separately and the fourth identifies all the types separately.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere29881
JournalJournal of medical virology
Volume96
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • HPV
  • HPV-based screening
  • cervical cancer screening
  • diagnostic test accuracy
  • test validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria for second generation comparator tests in validation of novel HPV DNA tests for use in cervical cancer screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this