Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Counting mitoses: SI(ze) matters!

  • Ian A. Cree*
  • , Puay Hoon Tan
  • , William D. Travis
  • , Pieter Wesseling
  • , Yukako Yagi
  • , Valerie A. White
  • , Dilani Lokuhetty
  • , Richard A. Scolyer
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • Singapore General Hospital
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
  • University of Colombo
  • Faculty of Medicine and Health
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Mitoses are often assessed by pathologists to assist the diagnosis of cancer, and to grade malignancy, informing prognosis. Historically, this has been done by expressing the number of mitoses per n high power fields (HPFs), ignoring the fact that microscope fields may differ substantially, even at the same high power (×400) magnification. Despite a requirement to define HPF size in scientific papers, many authors fail to address this issue adequately. The problem is compounded by the switch to digital pathology systems, where ×400 equivalent fields are rectangular and also vary in the area displayed. The potential for error is considerable, and at times this may affect patient care. This is easily solved by the use of standardized international (SI) units. We, therefore, recommend that features such as mitoses are always counted per mm2, with an indication of the area to be counted and the method used (usually “hotspot” or “average”) to obtain the results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1651-1657
Number of pages7
JournalModern pathology
Volume34
Issue number9
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Counting mitoses: SI(ze) matters!'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this