Corrigendum to “The impact of cut-off values on the prevalence of a short cervical length in pregnancy” [Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 302 (2024) 65–72 (European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2024) 302 (65–72), (S0301211524004858), (10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.08.046))

The authors report a minor inconsistency in the legends for a few figures and tables in the manuscript. These inconsistencies do no affect the overall findings, figures, or conclusions in the manuscript. The necessary corrections are as follows: • Figure 2B and 2C: The legend values should be consistent with those listed in Table 2. o The correct numbers are: Figure 2B: n = 7203, Figure 2C: n = 4645• Figure 4A and 4B: The legend values should be consistent with those listed in Table 4. o The correct numbers are: Figure 4A: n = 13.362, Figure 4B: n = 5663• Table 3: The number of inclusions should be 1871(<500); 2548 (500–1000) and 14752(>1000) respectively. Also, the number of institutions <500 should be 7.• Figure 3: The legend values should be consistent with those listed in Table 3 as named above. o The correct numbers are: Figure 3A: n = 1871, Figure 3B: n = 2549, Figure 3C: n = 14.752The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.